Solving the Heat Equation — Question 7

PDF ↗

Question 7

For the zero-endpoint heat problem ut=uxxu_t=u_{xx} on (0,π)(0,\pi), let f∈L2(0,π)f\in L^2(0,\pi) with ∥f∥2≤M\|f\|_2\le M, where M>0M>0. Its solution for t>0t>0 is u=∑n≥1bne−n2tsin⁡(nx),uN=∑n=1Nbne−n2tsin⁡(nx),N≥1.u=\sum_{n\ge 1}b_ne^{-n^2t}\sin(nx),\qquad u_N=\sum_{n=1}^N b_ne^{-n^2t}\sin(nx),\quad N\ge 1. You may use Parseval: ∑bn2=2∥f∥22/π\sum b_n^2=2\|f\|_2^2/\pi, and Cauchy–Schwarz.

Tasks

  1. Prove ∥u−uN∥2≤Me−(N+1)2t\|u-u_N\|_2\le M e^{-(N+1)^2t}. Show that the bound is sharp over the stated data class for each N,tN,t.

  2. Derive a uniform-in-xx error bound using Cauchy–Schwarz and the tail sum ∑n>Ne−2n2t\sum_{n>N}e^{-2n^2t}.

  3. Bound that sum by a geometric series using n=N+1+jn=N+1+j, j≥0j\ge 0, and obtain an explicit bound requiring no infinite summation.

  4. For M=1,t≥0.1M=1,t\ge 0.1, certify that six modes give a uniform error below 0.010.01. Explain why the available bound does not certify five modes, and why this does not prove that five modes fail for every particular initial field.

Original worksheet page 1: question and worked solution for 9-5-007
Show solutionHide solution

Question 7 – Solution

Strategy. A truncation certificate needs a bound on the omitted coefficients, not just a graph of the retained modes.

Step 1: Prove the sharp norm estimate. Orthogonality gives ∥u−uN∥22=π2∑n>Nbn2e−2n2t≤e−2(N+1)2t∥f∥22.\|u-u_N\|_2^2=\frac\pi 2\sum_{n>N}b_n^2e^{-2n^2t} \le e^{-2(N+1)^2t}\|f\|_2^2. Taking square roots proves the bound. Equality is attained by f=M2/πsin⁡((N+1)x)f=M\sqrt{2/\pi}\sin((N+1)x): all its energy lies in the first omitted mode. Thus the rate and constant are sharp for the whole L2L^2 ball.

Step 2: Control pointwise errors uniformly. Using |sin⁡nx|≤1|\sin nx|\le 1 and Cauchy–Schwarz, |u−uN|≤(∑n>Nbn2)1/2(∑n>Ne−2n2t)1/2≤2πM(∑n>Ne−2n2t)1/2.|u-u_N|\le\left(\sum_{n>N}b_n^2\right)^{1/2} \left(\sum_{n>N}e^{-2n^2t}\right)^{1/2} \le\sqrt{\frac 2\pi}M\left(\sum_{n>N}e^{-2n^2t}\right)^{1/2}. This bound is independent of xx and finite for t>0t>0. It also justifies uniform convergence of the positive-time solution for arbitrary L2L^2 data.

Step 3: Replace the tail by a geometric bound. For the integer j≥0j\ge 0, (N+1+j)2≥(N+1)2+(2N+3)j(N+1+j)^2\ge(N+1)^2+(2N+3)j, since j2≥jj^2\ge j. Therefore ∑n>Ne−2n2t≤e−2(N+1)2t1−e−2(2N+3)t,∥u−uN∥∞≤2πMe−(N+1)2t1−e−2(2N+3)t.\sum_{n>N}e^{-2n^2t}\le \frac{e^{-2(N+1)^2t}}{1-e^{-2(2N+3)t}},\qquad \boxed{\|u-u_N\|_\infty\le \sqrt{\frac 2\pi}\,\frac{M e^{-(N+1)^2t}}{\sqrt{1-e^{-2(2N+3)t}}}.} The denominator is positive because t>0t>0. Each factor makes this certificate decrease as time increases.

Step 4: Make a numerical guarantee with the correct scope. At t=0.1t=0.1, the bound is less than 0.006110.00611 for N=6N=6 and greater than 0.02260.0226 for N=5N=5. Hence six modes certify the requested 0.010.01 uniform error for every t≥0.1t\ge 0.1 and every datum with ∥f∥2≤1\|f\|_2\le 1. The five-mode certificate is too large; it does not prove failure for each field. For example, a datum supported entirely in the first five modes has zero truncation error with five modes. The bound is a sufficient test, not an exact error formula for unknown data.

Original worksheet page 2: question and worked solution for 9-5-007

Original worksheet layout. Use Enlarge or open the PDF for a closer view.