Laplace Transforms — Question 3

PDF ↗

Question 3

A delayed input drives the zero-state system x′=−x+H(t−2),y′=x−2y,x(0)=y(0)=0,t≥0.x'=-x+H(t-2),\qquad y'=x-2y,\qquad x(0)=y(0)=0,\quad t\ge 0. Here H(t−a)H(t-a) is zero for t<at<a and one for t>at>a; its value at the switch does not affect the continuous state. Interpret derivatives there one-sidedly.

Tasks

  1. Find the transforms of both components and identify the factor that encodes the input delay.

  2. Invert them to obtain a piecewise solution. Explain why multiplying an undelayed response by e−2te^{-2t} does not implement a delay.

  3. Determine continuity of x,y,x′,y′x,y,x',y' at t=2t=2, and find the one-sided values of y″y'' there.

  4. Prove both components increase after the switch and approach their limits without overshoot. Sketch their time responses, marking the switch and limiting levels.

Original worksheet page 1: question and worked solution for 5-11-003
Show solutionHide solution

Question 3 – Solution

Strategy. First invert the undelayed rational factors, then translate the entire response using the second shifting theorem.

Step 1: Transform both equations. With F=ℒ{x}F=\mathcal L\{x\} and G=ℒ{y}G=\mathcal L\{y\}, (s+1)F=e−2s/s(s+1)F=e^{-2s}/s and (s+2)G=F(s+2)G=F. Hence F=e−2ss(s+1),G=e−2ss(s+1)(s+2),Re⁡s>0.F=\frac{e^{-2s}}{s(s+1)},\qquad G=\frac{e^{-2s}}{s(s+1)(s+2)},\qquad \operatorname{Re}s>0. It is e−2se^{-2s}, rather than an exponential in time, that encodes the delay.

Step 2: Shift the inverse transforms. The undelayed inverses are 1−e−t1-e^{-t} and 12−e−t+12e−2t=12(1−e−t)2\tfrac 12-e^{-t}+\tfrac 12e^{-2t}=\tfrac 12(1-e^{-t})^2. Writing τ=t−2\tau=t-2, the solution is zero for t<2t<2, and for t≥2t\ge 2, x=1−e−τ,y=12(1−e−τ)2.\boxed{x=1-e^{-\tau},\qquad y=\tfrac 12(1-e^{-\tau})^2.} These formulas give zero at the joining point. Multiplication by e−2te^{-2t} would change decay rates while generally leaving a nonzero response before t=2t=2; it is a different transform operation.

Step 3: Check the switch regularity. Both states are continuous. Before the switch their derivatives vanish; after it x′=e−τx'=e^{-\tau} and y′=e−τ−e−2τy'=e^{-\tau}-e^{-2\tau}. Thus x′(2−)=0x'(2^-)=0, x′(2+)=1x'(2^+)=1, whereas y′(2−)=y′(2+)=0y'(2^-)=y'(2^+)=0. Afterward y″=−e−τ+2e−2τy''=-e^{-\tau}+2e^{-2\tau}, so y″(2−)=0,y″(2+)=1\boxed{y''(2^-)=0,\ y''(2^+)=1}. In particular yy is continuously differentiable at the switch but is not twice differentiable there.

Step 4: Establish shape and limits. For τ>0\tau>0, x′>0x'>0 and y′=e−τ(1−e−τ)>0y'=e^{-\tau}(1-e^{-\tau})>0. Also 0<x<10<x<1 and 0<y<1/20<y<1/2, with limits 11 and 1/21/2. These inequalities prove the absence of overshoot for all later times. The dotted horizontal guides in the sketch are limits; the solid and dashed curves are the components. Both remain zero throughout the waiting interval.

See the diagram in the original worksheet below.

Original worksheet page 2: question and worked solution for 5-11-003

Original worksheet layout. Use Enlarge or open the PDF for a closer view.