More on the Wronskian — Question 4

PDF ↗

Question 4

A regular equation y″+p(t)y′+q(t)y=0y''+p(t)y'+q(t)y=0 on ℝ\mathbb R has a known solution u=etu=e^t. A desired companion vv must satisfy W[u,v](t)=2e−t2,v(0)=0.W[u,v](t)=2e^{-t^2},\qquad v(0)=0. Assume p,qp,q are continuous; an unevaluated definite integral is an acceptable exact answer.

Tasks

  1. Determine the only possible coefficients p,qp,q.

  2. Construct vv using the prescribed Wronskian and initial value, and find v′(0)v\prime(0).

  3. Verify both the Wronskian and the differential equation without evaluating the integral.

  4. If the known solution uu were not supplied, would the prescribed Wronskian alone determine qq? Justify your answer using initial-data normalization for arbitrary continuous qq.

Original worksheet page 1: question and worked solution for 3-7-004
Show solutionHide solution

Question 4 – Solution

Strategy. Abel’s identity determines the first-derivative coefficient; the known nonzero solution then determines the remaining coefficient.

Step 1: Recover the equation. Since WW never vanishes, p=−W′/W=2t.p=-W'/W=2t. Substituting u=etu=e^t gives 1+p+q=01+p+q=0, hence y″+2ty′−(1+2t)y=0.\boxed{y''+2ty'-(1+2t)y=0.}

Step 2: Recover the companion. The identity W=et(v′−v)W=e^t(v'-v) gives v′−v=2e−t2−tv'-v=2e^{-t^2-t}. Multiplying by e−te^{-t} and integrating from zero yields v(t)=et∫0t2e−s2−2sds.\boxed{v(t)=e^t\int_0^t2e^{-s^2-2s}\,ds.} The integral is smooth on all of ℝ\mathbb R. It gives v(0)=0v(0)=0 and v′(0)=2v'(0)=2.

Step 3: Verify by differentiation. Write JJ for the integral, so J′=2e−t2−2tJ'=2e^{-t^2-2t}. Then v′=v+2e−t2−tv'=v+2e^{-t^2-t} and et(v′−v)=2e−t2e^t(v'-v)=2e^{-t^2}, as prescribed. If L[y]=y″+py′+qyL[y]=y''+py'+qy, direct expansion gives uL[v]−vL[u]=W′+pW.uL[v]-vL[u]=W'+pW. Here L[u]=0L[u]=0 and W′+2tW=0W'+2tW=0. Since u=et≠0u=e^t\ne 0, this proves L[v]=0L[v]=0 everywhere.

Step 4: Identify what the Wronskian omits. With p=2tp=2t and any continuous choice of qq, regular existence supplies solutions with data (1,0)(1,0) and (0,2)(0,2) at zero. Their initial Wronskian is 22, so Abel’s identity gives the same 2e−t22e^{-t^2} for every such qq. Thus the Wronskian alone fixes pp but not qq; the supplied nonzero seed was essential for the latter.

Original worksheet page 2: question and worked solution for 3-7-004

Original worksheet layout. Use Enlarge or open the PDF for a closer view.