Question 7
For a real second-order linear PDE in two spatial variables, use the convention At points where the second-order part is nonzero, call the equation hyperbolic if , elliptic if , and parabolic if . Consider
Tasks
Identify and classify the equation at every point of the plane, including the separating curve. Explain why the coefficient of is not itself.
Classify the points , and sketch the type regions with correct axes and boundary curve.
At a fixed point, rewrite the principal quadratic form as a completed square. Explain its signs and rank in all three regions.
Replace by and then multiply the entire PDE by a smooth nowhere-zero function . Decide which changes can alter the type and justify your answer.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 7 – Solution
Strategy. Classify the principal second-order part point by point, keeping the mixed-derivative convention fixed.
Step 1: Read the discriminant correctly. Here , and , since the mixed coefficient is . Thus , giving Since , the principal part never vanishes completely. The curve is therefore parabolic under the stated convention, not an order-zero exception.
Step 2: Check the points and the geometry. The three discriminants are respectively , so is hyperbolic, elliptic and parabolic. With horizontal and vertical, is a right-opening parabola; ellipticity lies to its right.
Step 3: Interpret the principal form. Completing the square gives . For , it is positive definite, with rank two. For , the choices and give opposite signs; it is indefinite with rank two. On , it is a nonnegative square of rank one, vanishing on the nonzero direction . This explains the type boundary algebraically.
Step 4: Identify changes that preserve type. Changing lower-order terms leaves unchanged. Multiplying by gives , with the same sign because . Neither operation changes type. Allowing could erase the principal part at those points, which is why the nowhere-zero restriction matters.
See the diagram in the original worksheet below.