The Wave Equation — Question 7

PDF ↗

Question 7

A fixed-end string is known to have displacement u(x,t)=Asin⁡(πx/L)cos⁡(cπt/L),A,L>0,u(x,t)=A\sin(\pi x/L)\cos(c\pi t/L),\qquad A,L>0, with unknown speed c>0c>0. A snapshot at a known time Δ>0\Delta>0 shows u(x,Δ)=0u(x,\Delta)=0 for every xx. Initially the shape and zero velocity are known.

Tasks

  1. Find every positive speed consistent with the zero snapshot and prove the list is complete.

  2. Determine the speed if the independent prior bound 0<c<L/Δ0<c<L/\Delta is available. Explain why the snapshot alone is insufficient without it.

  3. Derive the midpoint velocity at time Δ\Delta for each admissible speed. Give a consistency test for an exact signed velocity measurement and show that it identifies the speed uniquely when consistent.

  4. If the measured velocity is −5πA/(2Δ)-5\pi A/(2\Delta), find cc and predict the midpoint displacement at time Δ/2\Delta/2. Verify the signs rather than using only the velocity magnitude.

Original worksheet page 1: question and worked solution for 9-2-007
Show solutionHide solution

Question 7 – Solution

Strategy. A snapshot can hide how many oscillations have occurred; a velocity measurement retains both rate and direction.

Step 1: List all compatible speeds. Since the spatial sine is not identically zero, the snapshot requires cos⁡(cπΔ/L)=0\cos(c\pi\Delta/L)=0. For positive cc, cn=LΔ(n+12),n=0,1,2,….\boxed{c_n=\frac L\Delta\left(n+\frac 12\right),\qquad n=0,1,2,\ldots.} Every listed speed gives the same zero snapshot, as well as the specified initial displacement and zero velocity. The positive zeros of cosine prove completeness.

Step 2: Use an actual prior restriction. The bound c<L/Δc<L/\Delta allows only n=0n=0, so c=L/(2Δ)c=L/(2\Delta). Without this independent information, arbitrarily many half-oscillations may have occurred before the snapshot. A zero snapshot does not imply zero speed or determine which crossing of equilibrium was observed.

Step 3: Recover speed from signed velocity. At the midpoint, vn=ut(L/2,Δ)=(−1)n+1πAΔ(n+12).\boxed{v_n=u_t(L/2,\Delta) =(-1)^{n+1}\frac{\pi A}{\Delta}\left(n+\frac 12\right).} A measured vv is consistent exactly when n=|v|Δ/(πA)−1/2n=|v|\Delta/(\pi A)-1/2 is a nonnegative integer and its sign is (−1)n+1(-1)^{n+1}. The strictly increasing magnitudes then select one nn uniquely. In particular, a zero velocity measurement is incompatible with the stated nonzero-amplitude zero snapshot.

Step 4: Verify the numerical multiple. For v=−5πA/(2Δ)v=-5\pi A/(2\Delta), the magnitude gives n=2n=2 and the predicted sign (−1)3(-1)^3 is negative, as measured. Thus c=5L2Δ,u(L/2,Δ/2)=Acos⁡(5π/4)=−A2.\boxed{c=\frac{5L}{2\Delta},\qquad u(L/2,\Delta/2)=A\cos(5\pi/4)=-\frac{A}{\sqrt 2}.} The signed result distinguishes this phase from other times at which the displacement vanishes. Inferring the lowest possible speed without a prior bound would produce the wrong prediction for the intermediate snapshot.

Original worksheet page 2: question and worked solution for 9-2-007

Original worksheet layout. Use Enlarge or open the PDF for a closer view.