Relative Minimums and Maximums — Question 8

PDF ↗

Question 8

Let ff be differentiable at an interior point P=(a,b)P=(a,b) of its domain.

Tasks

  1. Prove that if ff has a relative maximum or minimum at PP, then ∇f(P)=𝟎\nabla f(P)=\mathbf 0.

  2. Explain why the converse is false.

  3. Apply the result to show that g(x,y)=x+eyg(x,y)=x+e^y has no relative extrema on ℝ2\mathbb R^2.

Original worksheet page 1: question and worked solution for 3-3-008
Show solutionHide solution

Question 8 – Solution

Strategy. Restrict the function to coordinate lines through the interior point and apply the one-variable necessary condition.

Step 1: Necessary condition Suppose ff has a relative extremum at (a,b)(a,b). The one-variable restriction ϕ(x)=f(x,b)\phi(x)=f(x,b) has a relative extremum at x=ax=a. Differentiability gives fx(a,b)=ϕ′(a)=0.f_x(a,b)=\phi'(a)=0. Likewise, ψ(y)=f(a,y)\psi(y)=f(a,y) has a relative extremum at bb, so fy(a,b)=ψ′(b)=0.f_y(a,b)=\psi'(b)=0. Therefore ∇f(P)=𝟎.\boxed{\nabla f(P)=\mathbf 0}.

Step 2: The converse A zero gradient makes PP a critical point, not necessarily an extremum. For instance, f(x,y)=x2−y2f(x,y)=x^2-y^2 has gradient zero at the origin but takes both positive and negative values nearby, so the origin is a saddle.

Step 3: Application For g(x,y)=x+eyg(x,y)=x+e^y, gx=1,gy=ey.g_x=1,\qquad g_y=e^y. In particular, the gradient is never zero. Since every point of ℝ2\mathbb R^2 is interior and gg is differentiable everywhere, the necessary condition rules out a relative maximum or minimum at every point. Hence g has no relative extrema on ℝ2.\boxed{g\text{ has no relative extrema on }\mathbb R^2}.

Original worksheet page 2: question and worked solution for 3-3-008

Original worksheet layout. Use Enlarge or open the PDF for a closer view.