Proof of Various Limit Properties — Question 7

PDF ↗

Question 7

Assume that limx→af(x)=Landlimx→ag(x)=M,\lim_{x\to a} f(x)=L \quad\text{and}\quad \lim_{x\to a} g(x)=M, and that f(x)≤g(x)for all x near a.f(x)\le g(x) \quad\text{for all }x\text{ near }a.

Prove that L≤M.L\le M.

Original worksheet page 1: question and worked solution for 7-1-007
Show solutionHide solution

Question 7 - Solution

We argue by contradiction.

Suppose, to the contrary, that L>M.L>M.

Then the positive number ε=L−M2\varepsilon=\frac{L-M}{2} satisfies ε>0\varepsilon>0.

Since lim⁡x→af(x)=L\lim_{x\to a} f(x)=L, there exists δ1>0\delta_1>0 such that whenever 0<|x−a|<δ1,0<|x-a|<\delta_1, we have |f(x)−L|<ε.|f(x)-L|<\varepsilon.

This implies f(x)>L−ε=L+M2.f(x)>L-\varepsilon=\frac{L+M}{2}.

Similarly, since lim⁡x→ag(x)=M\lim_{x\to a} g(x)=M, there exists δ2>0\delta_2>0 such that whenever 0<|x−a|<δ2,0<|x-a|<\delta_2, we have |g(x)−M|<ε.|g(x)-M|<\varepsilon.

This implies g(x)<M+ε=L+M2.g(x)<M+\varepsilon=\frac{L+M}{2}.

Let δ=min⁡(δ1,δ2).\delta=\min(\delta_1,\delta_2).

Then for all xx satisfying 0<|x−a|<δ0<|x-a|<\delta, we have f(x)>L+M2andg(x)<L+M2.f(x)>\frac{L+M}{2} \quad\text{and}\quad g(x)<\frac{L+M}{2}.

Thus, f(x)>g(x),f(x)>g(x), which contradicts the assumption that f(x)≤g(x)f(x)\le g(x) near aa.

Therefore, our assumption that L>ML>M must be false, and we conclude that L≤M.L\le M.

Original worksheet page 2: question and worked solution for 7-1-007

Original worksheet layout. Use Enlarge or open the PDF for a closer view.