Newton's First Law — Question 7

Section 5-2 · Physics pages 644–645

Question 7 Equal-time samples support but do not prove uniform motion At t=0, 1, 2 and 3 s a point has x=0, 2, 4 and 6 m. Two candidate histories are xA = 2t m and xB = 2t + 0.1 sin(2πt) m, with numerical seconds. t (s) x (m) xA = 2t, xB = 2t + 0.1 sin(2πt) Solid: B; dashed: A. Both pass through the four sampled points. (a) Check both candidates against the samples. (b) Is either candidate accelerated between samples? (c) Can these samples alone prove zero net force at every time?
Show solutionHide solution
Question 7 - Solution Equal-time samples support but do not prove uniform motion t (s) x (m) xA = 2t, xB = 2t + 0.1 sin(2πt) (a) Evaluate integer times. xB(n) = 2n + 0.1 sin(2πn) = 2n = xA(n), n = 0, 1, 2, 3 The sine term vanishes at each integer, so both histories produce all four reported positions. (b) Differentiate the candidates. vB = 2 + 0.2π cos(2πt), aB = −0.4π2 sin(2πt) A has constant 2 m/s velocity. B has vB = 2 + 0.2π cos(2πt) m/s and aB = −0.4π2 sin(2πt) m/s2, generally nonzero between samples. (c) Avoid an inference stronger than the data. aA = 0, aB(0.25) = −0.4π2 m/s2̸ = 0 The samples are consistent with first-law motion but do not uniquely establish it between measurements. Faster measurements or an independently justified model are needed to rule out unresolved variations.

Question 7

Equal-time samples support but do not prove uniform motion

At t=0, 1, 2 and 3 s a point has x=0, 2, 4 and 6 m. Two candidate histories are xA=2tx_A=2t m and xB=2t+0.1sin⁡(2πt)x_B=2t+0.1\sin(2\pi t) m, with numerical seconds.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Check both candidates against the samples.

  2. Is either candidate accelerated between samples?

  3. Can these samples alone prove zero net force at every time?

Question 7 - Solution

Equal-time samples support but do not prove uniform motion

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Evaluate integer times.

xB(n)=2n+0.1sin⁡(2πn)=2n=xA(n),n=0,1,2,3x_B(n)=2n+0.1\sin(2\pi n)=2n=x_A(n),\quad n=0,1,2,3 The sine term vanishes at each integer, so both histories produce all four reported positions.

(b) Differentiate the candidates.

vB=2+0.2πcos⁡(2πt),aB=−0.4π2sin⁡(2πt)v_B=2+0.2\pi\cos(2\pi t),\quad\boxed{a_B=-0.4\pi^2\sin(2\pi t)} A has constant 2 m/s velocity. B has vB=2+0.2πcos⁡(2πt)v_B=2+0.2\pi\cos(2\pi t) m/s and aB=−0.4π2sin⁡(2πt)a_B=-0.4\pi^2\sin(2\pi t) m/s2^2, generally nonzero between samples.

(c) Avoid an inference stronger than the data.

aA=0,aB(0.25)=−0.4π2m/s2≠0a_A=0,\qquad a_B(0.25)=-0.4\pi^2\,\mathrm{m/s^2}\ne0 The samples are consistent with first-law motion but do not uniquely establish it between measurements. Faster measurements or an independently justified model are needed to rule out unresolved variations.