Newton's First Law — Question 6

Section 5-2 · Physics pages 642–643

Question 6 A turning cabin fails the free-particle straight-line test A small free puck travels in a straight line at constant speed relative to an inertial floor. A camera rotates steadily with a platform. Its images show a curved puck track. The puck does not touch the platform. free track The dashed rotating platform does not contact the free puck in this experiment. (a) Which observed track directly satisfies the first-law free-motion form? (b) Why is the rotating camera not an inertial frame? (c) Would attaching the puck to the platform describe the same experiment?
Show solutionHide solution
Question 6 - Solution A turning cabin fails the free-particle straight-line test free track (a) Use the stipulated free inertial record.⃗ r(t) =⃗r0 +⃗v0t, d2⃗r dt2 =⃗0 (floor) The floor record is a straight line at constant speed, the first-law form. Its velocity is unchanged. (b) Check the axes, not just the origin.⃗ r′ = Q(t)⃗r : ¨⃗r′ = ¨Q⃗r + 2 ˙Q⃗v (¨⃗r = 0) The camera axes turn, so coordinate directions vary with time. A free particle need not have constant vector components or a straight track in those coordinates. Rotation requires additional terms when using Newtonian dynamical equations there. (c) Distinguish observation from interaction. |⃗aattached| = ω2r, |⃗Fnet| = mω2r (r > 0) Attaching the puck would add a constraint interaction that changes its motion. A coordinate transformation alone does not supply that interaction. The freely moving and attached cases have different physical systems.

Question 6

A turning cabin fails the free-particle straight-line test

A small free puck travels in a straight line at constant speed relative to an inertial floor. A camera rotates steadily with a platform. Its images show a curved puck track. The puck does not touch the platform.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Which observed track directly satisfies the first-law free-motion form?

  2. Why is the rotating camera not an inertial frame?

  3. Would attaching the puck to the platform describe the same experiment?

Question 6 - Solution

A turning cabin fails the free-particle straight-line test

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Use the stipulated free inertial record.

r→(t)=r→0+v→0t,d2r→dt2=0→(floor)\vec r(t)=\vec r_0+\vec v_0t,\quad\boxed{\frac{d^2\vec r}{dt^2}=\vec0}\quad\text{(floor)} The floor record is a straight line at constant speed, the first-law form. Its velocity is unchanged.

(b) Check the axes, not just the origin.

r→′=Q(t)r→:r→̈′=Q̈r→+2Q̇v→(r→̈=0)\vec r'=Q(t)\vec r:\quad\ddot{\vec r}'=\ddot Q\vec r+2\dot Q\vec v\quad(\ddot{\vec r}=0) The camera axes turn, so coordinate directions vary with time. A free particle need not have constant vector components or a straight track in those coordinates. Rotation requires additional terms when using Newtonian dynamical equations there.

(c) Distinguish observation from interaction.

|a→attached|=ω2r,|F→net|=mω2r(r>0)|\vec a_{\mathrm{attached}}|=\omega^2r,\quad |\vec F_{\mathrm{net}}|=m\omega^2r\quad(r>0) Attaching the puck would add a constraint interaction that changes its motion. A coordinate transformation alone does not supply that interaction. The freely moving and attached cases have different physical systems.