Gratings: Dispersion and Resolving Power — Question 10

Section 36-8 · Physics pages 6010–6011

Question 10 Independent coherent patches limit a grating to the patch size A grating has N=12000 illuminated slits, divided into four equal contiguous groups of M=3000. Slits within a group are fully coherent; relative phases between groups average randomly. Every slit alone contributes intensity I1. The envelope is broad and the groups share the same principal-order directions. M M M M four mutually incoherent groups Schematic; labels, not drawing lengths, specify the data. (a) Find the principal peak intensity and compare with full coherence over N slits. (b) Under this model, find the effective resolving power and wavelength separation in order m=2 at 600 nm.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 10 - Solution Independent coherent patches limit a grating to the patch size M M M M four mutually incoherent groups (a) Method and calculation Ipeak = 4M2I1 = NMI1, Ifully coherent = N2I1. Ipeak/Ifully coherent = M/N = 1/4 . (b) Interpretation and further calculation Incoherent sum of identical M-slit patterns: R = mM = 6000 . ∆λ = 600 nm/6000 = 0.100 nm . Physical check Adding independently phased groups increases collected power and peak signal but does not narrow the individual group’s diffraction peaks.

Question 10

Independent coherent patches limit a grating to the patch size

A grating has N=12000 illuminated slits, divided into four equal contiguous groups of M=3000. Slits within a group are fully coherent; relative phases between groups average randomly. Every slit alone contributes intensity I1I_1. The envelope is broad and the groups share the same principal-order directions.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Find the principal peak intensity and compare with full coherence over N slits.

  2. Under this model, find the effective resolving power and wavelength separation in order m=2 at 600nm600\,\mathrm{nm}.

Question 10 - Solution

Independent coherent patches limit a grating to the patch size

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

Ipeak=4M2I1=NMI1,Ifullycoherent=N2I1.I_{\mathrm{peak}}=4M^2I_1=NM I_1,\quad I_{\mathrm{fully\ coherent}}=N^2I_1.Ipeak/Ifullycoherent=M/N=1/4.\boxed{I_{\mathrm{peak}}/I_{\mathrm{fully\ coherent}}=M/N=1/4}.

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

Incoherent sum of identical M-slit patterns:ℛ=mM=6000.\text{Incoherent sum of identical M-slit patterns:}\quad\boxed{\mathcal R=mM=6000}.Δλ=600nm/6000=0.100nm.\boxed{\Delta\lambda=600\,\mathrm{nm}/6000=0.100\,\mathrm{nm}}.

Physical check

Adding independently phased groups increases collected power and peak signal but does not narrow the individual group’s diffraction peaks.