Total Internal Reflection — Question 6

Section 33-8 · Physics pages 5522–5523

Question 6 Evanescent field and squared-amplitude penetration lengths differ by two At a lossless total-reflection boundary, the low-index-side electric field envelope varies as E(z) = E(0)e−κz, where z points away from the interface and κ = (2π/λ0) √ n2 1 sin2 θ −n2 2. Take n1=1.50, n2=1.00, theta=60 degrees, and vacuum wavelength 600 nm. z |E| ℓE Schematic; labels, not drawing lengths, specify the data. (a) Find the field-amplitude 1/e penetration depth. (b) Find the 1/e depth of the squared field and explain why this does not imply an average normal transmitted power.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 6 - Solution Evanescent field and squared-amplitude penetration lengths differ by two z |E| ℓE (a) Method and calculation κ = 2π 600 nm √ 2.25(3/4) −1 = 2π 600 nm √ 11 4 . ℓE = κ−1 = 115.169 nm . (b) Interpretation and further calculation |E(z)|2/|E(0)|2 = e−2κz ⇒ℓE2 = 1/(2κ) = 57.5844 nm . ⟨Sz⟩= 0 for a single isolated lossless TIR interface. Physical check The evanescent field can carry energy parallel to the interface; its nonzero amplitude is not a propagating normal ray.

Question 6

Evanescent field and squared-amplitude penetration lengths differ by two

At a lossless total-reflection boundary, the low-index-side electric field envelope varies as E(z)=E(0)e−κzE(z)=E(0)e^{-\kappa z}, where z points away from the interface and κ=(2π/λ0)n12sin⁡2θ−n22\kappa=(2\pi/\lambda_0)\sqrt{n_1^2\sin^2\theta-n_2^2}. Take n1=1.50, n2=1.00, theta=60 degrees, and vacuum wavelength 600 nm.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Find the field-amplitude 1/e penetration depth.

  2. Find the 1/e depth of the squared field and explain why this does not imply an average normal transmitted power.

Question 6 - Solution

Evanescent field and squared-amplitude penetration lengths differ by two

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

κ=2π600nm2.25(3/4)−1=2π600nm114.\kappa=\frac{2\pi}{600\,\mathrm{nm}}\sqrt{2.25(3/4)-1}=\frac{2\pi}{600\,\mathrm{nm}}\frac{\sqrt{11}}4.ℓE=κ−1=115.169nm.\boxed{\ell_E=\kappa^{-1}=115.169\,\mathrm{nm}}.

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

|E(z)|2/|E(0)|2=e−2κz⇒ℓE2=1/(2κ)=57.5844nm.|E(z)|^2/|E(0)|^2=e^{-2\kappa z}\Rightarrow\boxed{\ell_{E^2}=1/(2\kappa)=57.5844\,\mathrm{nm}}.⟨Sz⟩=0for a single isolated lossless TIR interface.\boxed{\langle S_z\rangle=0}\quad\text{for a single isolated lossless TIR interface}.

Physical check

The evanescent field can carry energy parallel to the interface; its nonzero amplitude is not a propagating normal ray.