Paramagnetism — Question 10

Section 32-9 · Physics pages 5350–5351

Question 10 Slow magnetic relaxation separates static susceptibility from an AC response A weak paramagnet obeys the phenomenological relaxation law τ ˙M + M = χ0H0 cos ωt, with positive tau and static susceptibility chi0. Seek the steady periodic response; ignore heating and nonlinear effects. t normalized fields solid H; dashed scaled M Schematic; labels, not drawing lengths, specify the data. (a) Find amplitude and phase lag of M relative to H. (b) Find the in-phase and lagging quadrature coefficients, and determine the frequency where the quadrature coefficient is largest.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 10 - Solution Slow magnetic relaxation separates static susceptibility from an AC response t normalized fields solid H; dashed scaled M (a) Method and calculation M = A cos(ωt −δ), A = χ0H0 √ 1 + ω2τ 2 , tan δ = ωτ . M = H0[χ′ cos ωt + χ′′ sin ωt]. (b) Interpretation and further calculation χ′ = χ0 1 + ω2τ 2 , χ′′ = χ0ωτ 1 + ω2τ 2 . d du u 1 + u2 = 1 −u2 (1 + u2)2 ⇒ωmax = 1/τ, χ′′ max = χ0/2 . Physical check This explicitly supplied relaxation model is dynamic; a phase lag does not imply a permanent remanent magnetization after equilibrium at zero field.

Question 10

Slow magnetic relaxation separates static susceptibility from an AC response

A weak paramagnet obeys the phenomenological relaxation law τṀ+M=χ0H0cos⁡ωt\tau\dot M+M=\chi_0H_0\cos\omega t, with positive tau and static susceptibility chi0. Seek the steady periodic response; ignore heating and nonlinear effects.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Find amplitude and phase lag of M relative to H.

  2. Find the in-phase and lagging quadrature coefficients, and determine the frequency where the quadrature coefficient is largest.

Question 10 - Solution

Slow magnetic relaxation separates static susceptibility from an AC response

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

M=Acos⁡(ωt−δ),A=χ0H01+ω2τ2,tan⁡δ=ωτ.M=A\cos(\omega t-\delta),\quad\boxed{A=\frac{\chi_0H_0}{\sqrt{1+\omega^2\tau^2}},\quad\tan\delta=\omega\tau}.M=H0[χ′cos⁡ωt+χ′′sin⁡ωt].M=H_0[\chi^{\prime}\cos\omega t+\chi^{\prime\prime}\sin\omega t].

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

χ′=χ01+ω2τ2,χ′′=χ0ωτ1+ω2τ2.\boxed{\chi^{\prime}=\frac{\chi_0}{1+\omega^2\tau^2},\quad\chi^{\prime\prime}=\frac{\chi_0\omega\tau}{1+\omega^2\tau^2}}.dduu1+u2=1−u2(1+u2)2⇒ωmax=1/τ,χmax⁡′′=χ0/2.\frac{d}{du}\frac{u}{1+u^2}=\frac{1-u^2}{(1+u^2)^2}\Rightarrow\boxed{\omega_{\max}=1/\tau,\quad\chi^{\prime\prime}_{\max}=\chi_0/2}.

Physical check

This explicitly supplied relaxation model is dynamic; a phase lag does not imply a permanent remanent magnetization after equilibrium at zero field.