Ferromagnetism — Question 10

Section 32-10 · Physics pages 5370–5371

Question 10 Frequency scaling separates hysteresis loss from eddy-current loss At fixed peak induction, a core loss model is P(f) = af + bf2, where a and b are positive. Measurements give P=3.0 W at 50 Hz and P=8.0 W at 100 Hz. Suppose b is proportional to lamination thickness squared while a remains unchanged. f P/f a slope b Schematic; labels, not drawing lengths, specify the data. (a) Infer a and b, with units, and separate the two loss contributions at 100 Hz. (b) Find the predicted power at 100 Hz after lamination thickness is halved, and determine the frequency where the two contributions are equal before this change.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 10 - Solution Frequency scaling separates hysteresis loss from eddy-current loss f P/f a slope b (a) Method and calculation 50a + 2500b = 3, 100a + 10000b = 8 ⇒b = 4.0 × 10−4 W/Hz2 . a = 0.040 W/Hz ; Ph(100) = 4.0 W, Pe(100) = 4.0 W. (b) Interpretation and further calculation bnew = b/4 ⇒Pnew(100) = 4.0 + 1.0 = 5.0 W . af = bf2, f > 0 ⇒f∗= a/b = 100 Hz . Physical check These predictions hold at the same peak induction and within the supplied loss model; changing thickness does not remove hysteresis loss.

Question 10

Frequency scaling separates hysteresis loss from eddy-current loss

At fixed peak induction, a core loss model is P(f)=af+bf2P(f)=af+bf^2, where a and b are positive. Measurements give P=3.0 W at 50 Hz and P=8.0 W at 100 Hz. Suppose b is proportional to lamination thickness squared while a remains unchanged.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Infer a and b, with units, and separate the two loss contributions at 100 Hz.

  2. Find the predicted power at 100 Hz after lamination thickness is halved, and determine the frequency where the two contributions are equal before this change.

Question 10 - Solution

Frequency scaling separates hysteresis loss from eddy-current loss

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

50a+2500b=3,100a+10000b=8⇒b=4.0×10−4W/Hz2.50a+2500b=3,\quad100a+10000b=8\Rightarrow\boxed{b=4.0\times10^{-4}\,\mathrm{W/Hz^2}}.a=0.040W/Hz;Ph(100)=4.0W,Pe(100)=4.0W.\boxed{a=0.040\,\mathrm{W/Hz}};\quad P_h(100)=4.0\,\mathrm W,\quad P_e(100)=4.0\,\mathrm W.

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

bnew=b/4⇒Pnew(100)=4.0+1.0=5.0W.b_{\mathrm{new}}=b/4\Rightarrow\boxed{P_{\mathrm{new}}(100)=4.0+1.0=5.0\,\mathrm W}.af=bf2,f>0⇒f*=a/b=100Hz.af=bf^2,\ f>0\Rightarrow\boxed{f_*=a/b=100\,\mathrm{Hz}}.

Physical check

These predictions hold at the same peak induction and within the supplied loss model; changing thickness does not remove hysteresis loss.