Components of Vectors — Question 5

Section 3-3 · Physics pages 360–361

Question 5 Can the instrument readings describe one vector? A two-dimensional instrument prints magnitude A = 10.0 m and components Ax = 8.0 m, Ay = 8.0 m. A second version states hard bounds 9.9 ≤A ≤10.1 m and 7.9 ≤Ax, Ay ≤8.1 m. Hard bounds mean all true values must lie in the stated intervals. Ax Ay allowed components A = 10 circle Schematic: the component rectangle lies outside the allowed magnitude circle. (a) Check the exact report and explain why testing each component separately is insufficient. (b) Find the range of magnitudes allowed by the bounded component readings. Can rounding within those bounds reconcile the report? (c) If A = 10.0 m and Ax = 8.0 m are trusted exactly, what positive Ay repairs the report?
Show solutionHide solution
Question 5 - Solution Can the instrument readings describe one vector? Ax Ay allowed components A = 10 circle (a) Check the joint relation. 82 + 82 = 128̸ = 102 ⇒Aimplied = 8 √ 2 m = 11.314 m Each component is less than 10 m, but the pair implies A = √ 82 + 82 = 8 √ 2 ≈11.314 m. Both projections must satisfy A2 = A2 x + A2 y together; separate component bounds are only necessary conditions. (b) Propagate the full allowed rectangle. A ∈[7.9 √ 2, 8.1 √ 2] m = [11.172, 11.455] m, [11.172, 11.455] ∩[9.9, 10.1] = ∅ All components are positive, so the minimum and maximum lengths occur at (7.9, 7.9) and (8.1, 8.1). Thus 11.172 ≲A ≲11.455 m. This interval does not intersect [9.9, 10.1] m. The specified rounding tolerance cannot explain the inconsistency. (c) Repair the untrusted entry. Ay = + √ 102 −82 = 6 m Ay = + √ 102 −82 = 6.0 m. The positive sign uses the stated requirement; without it, −6.0 m would also satisfy the magnitude. This repair assumes the two trusted entries really are exact.

Question 5

Can the instrument readings describe one vector?

A two-dimensional instrument prints magnitude A=10.0A=10.0 m and components Ax=8.0A_x=8.0 m, Ay=8.0A_y=8.0 m. A second version states hard bounds 9.9≤A≤10.19.9\leq A\leq10.1 m and 7.9≤Ax,Ay≤8.17.9\leq A_x,A_y\leq8.1 m. Hard bounds mean all true values must lie in the stated intervals.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Check the exact report and explain why testing each component separately is insufficient.

  2. Find the range of magnitudes allowed by the bounded component readings. Can rounding within those bounds reconcile the report?

  3. If A=10.0A=10.0 m and Ax=8.0A_x=8.0 m are trusted exactly, what positive AyA_y repairs the report?

Question 5 - Solution

Can the instrument readings describe one vector?

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Check the joint relation.

82+82=128≠102⇒Aimplied=82m=11.314m8^2+8^2=128\ne10^2\Rightarrow\boxed{A_{\mathrm{implied}}=8\sqrt2\,\mathrm m=11.314\,\mathrm m} Each component is less than 10 m, but the pair implies A=82+82=82≈11.314A=\sqrt{8^2+8^2}=8\sqrt2\approx11.314 m. Both projections must satisfy A2=Ax2+Ay2A^2=A_x^2+A_y^2 together; separate component bounds are only necessary conditions.

(b) Propagate the full allowed rectangle.

A∈[7.92,8.12]m=[11.172,11.455]m,[11.172,11.455]∩[9.9,10.1]=⌀A\in[7.9\sqrt2,8.1\sqrt2]\,\mathrm m=[11.172,11.455]\,\mathrm m,\quad[11.172,11.455]\cap[9.9,10.1]=\varnothing All components are positive, so the minimum and maximum lengths occur at (7.9,7.9)(7.9,7.9) and (8.1,8.1)(8.1,8.1). Thus 11.172≲A≲11.45511.172\lesssim A\lesssim11.455 m. This interval does not intersect [9.9,10.1][9.9,10.1] m. The specified rounding tolerance cannot explain the inconsistency.

(c) Repair the untrusted entry.

Ay=+102−82=6mA_y=+\sqrt{10^2-8^2}=6\,\mathrm m Ay=+102−82=6.0A_y=+\sqrt{10^2-8^2}=6.0 m. The positive sign uses the stated requirement; without it, −6.0-6.0 m would also satisfy the magnitude. This repair assumes the two trusted entries really are exact.