Measuring Temperature — Question 4

Section 18-3 · Physics pages 2858–2859

Question 4 Two calibration anchors cannot rule out curvature An indicator is calibrated at 300 and 400 K. Two possible response laws, in numerical kelvin coordinates t = T/(1 K), are x1 = t and x2 = t + .002(t −300)(t −400). Both are monotone on this range. An operator treats x directly as a kelvin reading. T x Two response curves share endpoints but differ between them. (a) Compare both readings at T = 350 K. Verify that both models fit the calibration endpoints. (b) Find the maximum magnitude of their disagreement within the calibrated range and propose one additional reference temperature that best distinguishes them.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 4 - Solution Two calibration anchors cannot rule out curvature T x (a) Method and calculation x1(300) = x2(300) = 300, x1(400) = x2(400) = 400. x1(350) = 350, x2(350) = 350 + .002(50)(−50) = 345. Both fit the endpoints but disagree by 5 indicated kelvins in the middle. (b) Interpretation and further calculation Complete the square: x2 −x1 = .002[(t −350)2 −2500]. max 300≤t≤400 |x2 −x1| = 5 at t = 350. A traceable 350 K reference is most discriminating for these particular models. It does not exclude every other possible curvature. Physical check The curved model has dx2/dt = 1 + .002(2t −700) between .8 and 1.2, so nonmonotonicity is not the cause.

Question 4

Two calibration anchors cannot rule out curvature

An indicator is calibrated at 300300 and 400K400\,\mathrm K. Two possible response laws, in numerical kelvin coordinates t=T/(1K)t=T/(1\,\mathrm K), are x1=tx_1=t and x2=t+.002(t−300)(t−400)x_2=t+.002(t-300)(t-400). Both are monotone on this range. An operator treats xx directly as a kelvin reading.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Compare both readings at T=350KT=350\,\mathrm K. Verify that both models fit the calibration endpoints.

  2. Find the maximum magnitude of their disagreement within the calibrated range and propose one additional reference temperature that best distinguishes them.

Question 4 - Solution

Two calibration anchors cannot rule out curvature

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

x1(300)=x2(300)=300,x1(400)=x2(400)=400.x_1(300)=x_2(300)=300,\qquad x_1(400)=x_2(400)=400.x1(350)=350,x2(350)=350+.002(50)(−50)=345.x_1(350)=350,\qquad x_2(350)=350+.002(50)(-50)=345.Both fit the endpoints but disagree by 55 indicated kelvins in the middle.

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

Complete the square:x2−x1=.002[(t−350)2−2500].x_2-x_1=.002[(t-350)^2-2500].max300≤t≤400|x2−x1|=5at t=350.\max_{300\le t\le400}|x_2-x_1|=5\quad\text{at }t=350.A traceable 350350 K reference is most discriminating for these particular models. It does not exclude every other possible curvature.

Physical check

The curved model has dx2/dt=1+.002(2t−700)dx_2/dt=1+.002(2t-700) between .8.8 and 1.21.2, so nonmonotonicity is not the cause.