The Zeroth Law of Thermodynamics — Question 2

Section 18-2 · Physics pages 2834–2835

Question 2 An insulating partition makes no equilibrium test A and B are separated by an ideal adiabatic partition. Their temperatures remain 350 and 290 K while no energy crosses it. Replacing it by a conducting link gives the supplied initial transfer law PA→B = G(TA −TB) with G = .40 W/K. 350 K 290 K replace insulating partition Schematic; labels, not drawing lengths, specify the data. (a) Calculate the initial rate after replacement. Why was the earlier zero transfer not evidence of thermal equilibrium? (b) With the conducting link, a detector reports |P| ≤.020 W. Bound |TA −TB|. State why the result depends on knowing that G is nonzero.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 2 - Solution An insulating partition makes no equilibrium test 350 K 290 K replace insulating partition (a) Method and calculation ∆T = 350 −290 = 60 K, PA→B = .40(60) = 24 W. The insulating case has G = 0 =⇒P = 0 for every ∆T. Preventing interaction does not demonstrate equality of temperatures. (b) Interpretation and further calculation |∆T| = |P| G ≤.020 .40 = .050 K. This is a finite-resolution equality test. If the link were broken, G = 0 and division would be invalid; no temperature bound would follow. Physical check The zeroth law concerns mutual thermal equilibrium when thermal comparison is possible, not mere absence of observed transfer through an isolator.

Question 2

An insulating partition makes no equilibrium test

A and B are separated by an ideal adiabatic partition. Their temperatures remain 350350 and 290K290\,\mathrm K while no energy crosses it. Replacing it by a conducting link gives the supplied initial transfer law PA→B=G(TA−TB)P_{A\to B}=G(T_A-T_B) with G=.40W/KG=.40\,\mathrm{W/K}.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Calculate the initial rate after replacement. Why was the earlier zero transfer not evidence of thermal equilibrium?

  2. With the conducting link, a detector reports |P|≤.020W|P|\le.020\,\mathrm W. Bound |TA−TB||T_A-T_B|. State why the result depends on knowing that GG is nonzero.

Question 2 - Solution

An insulating partition makes no equilibrium test

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

ΔT=350−290=60K,PA→B=.40(60)=24W.\Delta T=350-290=60\,\mathrm K,\qquad P_{A\to B}=.40(60)=24\,\mathrm W.The insulating case hasG=0⇒P=0for every ΔT.G=0\ \Longrightarrow\ P=0\quad\text{for every }\Delta T.Preventing interaction does not demonstrate equality of temperatures.

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

|ΔT|=|P|G≤.020.40=.050K.|\Delta T|=\frac{|P|}{G}\le\frac{.020}{.40}=.050\,\mathrm K.This is a finite-resolution equality test. If the link were broken, G=0G=0 and division would be invalid; no temperature bound would follow.

Physical check

The zeroth law concerns mutual thermal equilibrium when thermal comparison is possible, not mere absence of observed transfer through an isolator.