The Zeroth Law of Thermodynamics — Question 1

Section 18-2 · Physics pages 2832–2833

Question 1 Equilibrium comparisons form connected temperature classes Unchanged equilibrium bodies A, B, C, D and E are tested in pairs. A is in thermal equilibrium with B, B with C, and D with E. Separately, A is found hotter than D. Write X ∼Y for thermal equilibrium. Assume each comparison tests the same retained body state. A B C Specified contact relations; not a geometric scale drawing. (a) List all pairs whose equilibrium follows from the zeroth law. How many distinct temperature classes are established? (b) Infer the ordering of C and E. Which extra comparison could merge the classes, and why would that contradict one of the original observations?
Show solutionHide solution
Question 1 - Solution Equilibrium comparisons form connected temperature classes A B C (a) Method and calculation Transitivity gives A ∼B, B ∼C =⇒A ∼C. C1 = {A, B, C}, C2 = {D, E}. The unordered equal-temperature pairs are AB, AC, BC and DE; the hotter-than observation makes these two classes distinct. (b) Interpretation and further calculation TC = TA > TD = TE =⇒TC > TE. An equilibrium result such as C ∼E would imply TA = TC = TE = TD, contradicting TA > TD. At least one result, retained-state assumption or comparison method would then require revision. Physical check Equilibrium is transitive for unchanged equilibrium states, not for labels attached to bodies whose temperatures change during testing.

Question 1

Equilibrium comparisons form connected temperature classes

Unchanged equilibrium bodies A, B, C, D and E are tested in pairs. A is in thermal equilibrium with B, B with C, and D with E. Separately, A is found hotter than D. Write X∼YX\sim Y for thermal equilibrium. Assume each comparison tests the same retained body state.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. List all pairs whose equilibrium follows from the zeroth law. How many distinct temperature classes are established?

  2. Infer the ordering of C and E. Which extra comparison could merge the classes, and why would that contradict one of the original observations?

Question 1 - Solution

Equilibrium comparisons form connected temperature classes

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

Transitivity givesA∼B,B∼C⇒A∼C.A\sim B,\ B\sim C\ \Longrightarrow\ A\sim C.𝒞1={A,B,C},𝒞2={D,E}.\mathcal C_1=\{A,B,C\},\qquad\mathcal C_2=\{D,E\}.The unordered equal-temperature pairs are AB, AC, BC and DE; the hotter-than observation makes these two classes distinct.

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

TC=TA>TD=TE⇒TC>TE.T_C=T_A>T_D=T_E\ \Longrightarrow\ T_C>T_E.An equilibrium result such as C∼EC\sim E would implyTA=TC=TE=TD,T_A=T_C=T_E=T_D,contradicting TA>TDT_A>T_D. At least one result, retained-state assumption or comparison method would then require revision.

Physical check

Equilibrium is transitive for unchanged equilibrium states, not for labels attached to bodies whose temperatures change during testing.