Intensity and Sound Level — Question 9

Section 17-5 · Physics pages 2728–2729

Question 9 An inclined receiving surface intercepts projected acoustic area A uniform plane wave has intensity I = 2.0 × 10−3 W/m2. It strikes a flat plate of actual area A = 0.50 m2 at 60◦to its normal. The plate absorbs 30% of incident energy; the rest is reflected or transmitted. ˆn I A Incident flux and plate normal; the stated angle determines projected area. (a) Find incident and absorbed powers. (b) Find absorbed energy in 40 s and compare with normal incidence. Why must the angle be measured from the normal?
Show solutionHide solution
Question 9 - Solution An inclined receiving surface intercepts projected acoustic area ˆn I A (a) Method and calculation Intensity is flux through a surface perpendicular to propagation. The projected receiving area is A cos θ, so Win = IA cos 60◦= 5.0 × 10−4 W, Wabs = 0.30Win = 1.5 × 10−4 W. (b) Interpretation and further calculation The absorbed energy is E = Wabs∆t = (1.5 × 10−4)(40) = 0.0060 J. Normal incidence doubles this to 0.0120 J. The surface flux is I · ˆn, which explains the cosine of the normal angle; using the surface angle requires a sine instead. Physical check At grazing incidence the projected area tends to zero in this geometric model. Finite-edge diffraction is neglected.

Question 9

An inclined receiving surface intercepts projected acoustic area

A uniform plane wave has intensity I=2.0×10−3W/m2I=2.0\times10^{-3}\,\mathrm{W/m^2}. It strikes a flat plate of actual area A=0.50m2A=0.50\,\mathrm{m^2} at 60∘60^\circ to its normal. The plate absorbs 30%30\% of incident energy; the rest is reflected or transmitted.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Find incident and absorbed powers.

  2. Find absorbed energy in 40s40\,\mathrm s and compare with normal incidence. Why must the angle be measured from the normal?

Question 9 - Solution

An inclined receiving surface intercepts projected acoustic area

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

Intensity is flux through a surface perpendicular to propagation. The projected receiving area is Acos⁡θA\cos\theta, soWin=IAcos⁡60∘=5.0×10−4W,W_{\mathrm{in}}=IA\cos60^\circ=5.0\times10^{-4}\,\mathrm W,Wabs=0.30Win=1.5×10−4W.W_{\mathrm{abs}}=0.30W_{\mathrm{in}}=1.5\times10^{-4}\,\mathrm W.

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

The absorbed energy isE=WabsΔt=(1.5×10−4)(40)=0.0060J.E=W_{\mathrm{abs}}\Delta t=(1.5\times10^{-4})(40)=0.0060\,\mathrm J.Normal incidence doubles this to 0.0120J0.0120\,\mathrm J. The surface flux is 𝑰⋅𝒏̂\mathbf I\cdot\hat{\mathbf n}, which explains the cosine of the normal angle; using the surface angle requires a sine instead.

Physical check

At grazing incidence the projected area tends to zero in this geometric model. Finite-edge diffraction is neglected.