Interference — Question 10

Section 17-4 · Physics pages 2710–2711

Question 10 A far-field fringe estimate can be checked against exact paths Two in-phase point sources lie at (0, ±d/2) with d = 1.0 m. A receiver is at (R, y) = (10.0, 2.0) m. Assume equal received amplitudes for the phase calculation and c = 340 m/s. S2 S1 P r2 r1 Exact source-to-receiver distances are used; the drawing is not to scale. (a) Compute the exact absolute path difference and compare it with the paraxial estimate dy/R. (b) Find the lowest positive frequency giving cancellation at that receiver, using exact distances. Quantify the error from using the paraxial path estimate.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 10 - Solution A far-field fringe estimate can be checked against exact paths S2 S1 P r2 r1 (a) Method and calculation The distances are rnear = √ 102 + 1.52, rfar = √ 102 + 2.52. ∆r = rfar −rnear = 0.195890 m. The paraxial estimate is dy/R = 0.200 m, about 2.10% too large. (b) Interpretation and further calculation The first cancellation satisfies f∆r/c = 1/2, so f = 340 2∆r = 867.83 Hz. The paraxial value is 340/(2 × 0.200) = 850 Hz, about 2.05% too low. Inverting an approximate path difference changes the sign of its relative error to first order. Physical check The paraxial approximation requires both source spacing and receiver offset small compared with range. Equal received amplitudes are a separate idealization.

Question 10

A far-field fringe estimate can be checked against exact paths

Two in-phase point sources lie at (0,±d/2)(0,\pm d/2) with d=1.0md=1.0\,\mathrm m. A receiver is at (R,y)=(10.0,2.0)m(R,y)=(10.0,2.0)\,\mathrm m. Assume equal received amplitudes for the phase calculation and c=340m/sc=340\,\mathrm{m/s}.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Compute the exact absolute path difference and compare it with the paraxial estimate dy/Rdy/R.

  2. Find the lowest positive frequency giving cancellation at that receiver, using exact distances. Quantify the error from using the paraxial path estimate.

Question 10 - Solution

A far-field fringe estimate can be checked against exact paths

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

The distances arernear=102+1.52,rfar=102+2.52.r_{\mathrm{near}}=\sqrt{10^2+1.5^2},\quad r_{\mathrm{far}}=\sqrt{10^2+2.5^2}.Δr=rfar−rnear=0.195890m.\Delta r=r_{\mathrm{far}}-r_{\mathrm{near}}=0.195890\,\mathrm m.The paraxial estimate is dy/R=0.200mdy/R=0.200\,\mathrm m, about 2.10%2.10\% too large.

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

The first cancellation satisfies fΔr/c=1/2f\Delta r/c=1/2, sof=3402Δr=867.83Hz.f=\frac{340}{2\Delta r}=867.83\,\mathrm{Hz}.The paraxial value is 340/(2×0.200)=850Hz340/(2\times0.200)=850\,\mathrm{Hz}, about 2.05%2.05\% too low. Inverting an approximate path difference changes the sign of its relative error to first order.

Physical check

The paraxial approximation requires both source spacing and receiver offset small compared with range. Equal received amplitudes are a separate idealization.