The Requirements of Equilibrium — Question 2

Section 12-2 · Physics pages 1794–1795

Question 2 Three nonparallel support forces must meet on a common line intersection A planar rigid body is in equilibrium under exactly three nonzero forces and no applied couples. Two of their lines of action intersect at a finite point P, and are not parallel. P Candidate concurrent lines; force magnitudes still require independent balance. (a) Prove that the third line must also pass through P. (b) Is concurrence alone sufficient? Test three concurrent forces (3, 0), (0, 4) and (−3, −3) N.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 2 - Solution Three nonparallel support forces must meet on a common line intersection P (a) Derivation and calculation Let the third force act at⃗r3 relative to P. The first two force lines pass through P, so τ1P = τ2P = 0, ∑ τP =⃗r3 ×⃗F3 = 0. Because⃗F3̸ = 0, its perpendicular lever arm must vanish: F3d⊥= 0 =⇒ d⊥= 0 . Thus its line of action also passes through P. (b) Result and interpretation Concurrence guarantees zero torque about P but not force balance. For the example, ∑⃗ F = (3, 0) + (0, 4) + (−3, −3) = (0, 1) N̸ =⃗0. The force polygon fails to close. Static equilibrium additionally requires ∑ Fx = 0, ∑ Fy = 0. Physical check The argument excludes parallel force lines and applied couples, as stipulated.

Question 2

Three nonparallel support forces must meet on a common line intersection

A planar rigid body is in equilibrium under exactly three nonzero forces and no applied couples. Two of their lines of action intersect at a finite point PP, and are not parallel.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Prove that the third line must also pass through PP.

  2. Is concurrence alone sufficient? Test three concurrent forces (3,0)(3,0), (0,4)(0,4) and (−3,−3)N(-3,-3)\,\mathrm N.

Question 2 - Solution

Three nonparallel support forces must meet on a common line intersection

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Derivation and calculation

Let the third force act at r→3\vec r_3 relative to PP. The first two force lines pass through PP, so τ1P=τ2P=0,∑τP=r→3×F→3=0.\tau_{1P}=\tau_{2P}=0,\qquad\sum\tau_P=\vec r_3\times\vec F_3=0. Because F→3≠0\vec F_3\ne0, its perpendicular lever arm must vanish: F3d⟂=0⇒d⟂=0.F_3d_\perp=0\quad\Longrightarrow\quad\boxed{d_\perp=0}. Thus its line of action also passes through PP.

(b) Result and interpretation

Concurrence guarantees zero torque about PP but not force balance. For the example, ∑F→=(3,0)+(0,4)+(−3,−3)=(0,1)N≠0→.\sum\vec F=(3,0)+(0,4)+(-3,-3)=\boxed{(0,1)\ \mathrm N}\ne\vec0. The force polygon fails to close. Static equilibrium additionally requires ∑Fx=0,∑Fy=0.\sum F_x=0,\qquad\sum F_y=0.

Physical check

The argument excludes parallel force lines and applied couples, as stipulated.