Changing Units — Question 9

Section 1-3 · Physics pages 68–69

Question 9 A formula coefficient has a unit convention too A fitted resistance-force model is supplied as an equation between numerical values: F N = 0.0200 ( v km/h )2 . Here F is force magnitude and v is speed. The notation v/(km/h) means the number obtained when speed is expressed in kilometres per hour. Take the coefficient as exact within this exercise. No claim about a universal force law is intended. A new program accepts the speed in m/s but keeps the numerical coefficient 0.0200. Use exact 1 km = 1000 m, 1 h = 3600 s, and 1 N = 1 kg m/s2. v/(km/h) v/(m/s) F/N square, then ×0.0200 square, then ×B ×3.6 Two numerical speed conventions must predict the same physical force. (a) Rewrite the given model as F/N = B[v/(m/s)]2 and determine B. Show why the conversion factor is squared. (b) For v = 10.0 m/s, compare the correct force with the new program’s force. Give the factor by which the new program underestimates the result. (c) Write a quantity equation F = kv2 valid without a fixed choice of units, and give k in coherent SI units. Explain why k is not dimensionless even though the displayed coefficient 0.0200 is a pure number. (d) A colleague changes only the coefficient’s label from N/(km/h)2 to N/(m/s)2. Explain why this relabeling changes the model.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 9 - Solution A formula coefficient has a unit convention too v/(km/h) v/(m/s) F/N square, then ×0.0200 square, then ×B ×3.6 (a) Substitute the relation between numerical speed values. Since 1 m/s = 3.6 km/h, v km/h = 3.6 v m/s. Therefore F N = 0.0200(3.6)2 ( v m/s )2 , B = 0.2592 . The complete numerical speed is squared, so its conversion factor is squared as well. (b) Evaluate the same physical speed in both implementations. At 10.0 m/s = 36.0 km/h, Fcorrect = 0.0200(36.0)2 N = 0.2592(10.0)2 N = 25.92 N . The faulty program gives [0.0200(10.0)2] N = 2.000 N. The correct force is larger by the factor 25.92/2.000 = 12.96 . (c) Restore the units carried by the coefficient. [k] = [F] [v]2 = kg m s−2 m2 s−2 = kg m−1. Multiplying the numerical-value equation by newton yields F = kv2, k = 0.2592 N (m/s)2 = 0.2592 kg/m . The unit follows from force divided by speed squared. The original 0.0200 is a pure number because its equation divides both physical quantities by stated units. Its corresponding physical coefficient is 0.0200 N/(km/h)2, which equals the k above. (d) Convert the coefficient; do not merely rename it. km/h and m/s are different-sized units. Replacing the label while retaining 0.0200 changes the physical coefficient to 0.0200 kg/m, reducing it by a factor of 12.96. A correct conversion preserves k and changes both its numerical value and its unit representation together.

Question 9

A formula coefficient has a unit convention too

A fitted resistance-force model is supplied as an equation between numerical values: FN=0.0200(vkm/h)2.\frac{F}{\mathrm{N}}=0.0200\left(\frac{v}{\mathrm{km/h}}\right)^2. Here FF is force magnitude and vv is speed. The notation v/(km/h)v/(\mathrm{km/h}) means the number obtained when speed is expressed in kilometres per hour. Take the coefficient as exact within this exercise. No claim about a universal force law is intended.

A new program accepts the speed in m/s\mathrm{m/s} but keeps the numerical coefficient 0.0200. Use exact 1km=1000m1\ \mathrm{km}=1000\ \mathrm{m}, 1h=3600s1\ \mathrm{h}=3600\ \mathrm{s}, and 1N=1kgm/s21\ \mathrm{N}=1\ \mathrm{kg\,m/s^2}.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Rewrite the given model as F/N=B[v/(m/s)]2F/\mathrm{N}=B[v/(\mathrm{m/s})]^2 and determine BB. Show why the conversion factor is squared.

  2. For v=10.0m/sv=10.0\ \mathrm{m/s}, compare the correct force with the new program’s force. Give the factor by which the new program underestimates the result.

  3. Write a quantity equation F=kv2F=kv^2 valid without a fixed choice of units, and give kk in coherent SI units. Explain why kk is not dimensionless even though the displayed coefficient 0.0200 is a pure number.

  4. A colleague changes only the coefficient’s label from N/(km/h)2\mathrm{N/(km/h)^2} to N/(m/s)2\mathrm{N/(m/s)^2}. Explain why this relabeling changes the model.

Question 9 - Solution

A formula coefficient has a unit convention too

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Substitute the relation between numerical speed values.

Since 1m/s=3.6km/h1\ \mathrm{m/s}=3.6\ \mathrm{km/h}, vkm/h=3.6vm/s.\frac{v}{\mathrm{km/h}}=3.6\frac{v}{\mathrm{m/s}}. Therefore FN=0.0200(3.6)2(vm/s)2,B=0.2592.\frac{F}{\mathrm{N}}=0.0200(3.6)^2 \left(\frac{v}{\mathrm{m/s}}\right)^2, \qquad\boxed{B=0.2592}. The complete numerical speed is squared, so its conversion factor is squared as well.

(b) Evaluate the same physical speed in both implementations.

At 10.0m/s=36.0km/h10.0\ \mathrm{m/s}=36.0\ \mathrm{km/h}, Fcorrect=0.0200(36.0)2N=0.2592(10.0)2N=25.92N.F_{\mathrm{correct}}=0.0200(36.0)^2\ \mathrm{N} =0.2592(10.0)^2\ \mathrm{N}=\boxed{25.92\ \mathrm{N}}. The faulty program gives [0.0200(10.0)2]N=2.000N[0.0200(10.0)^2]\ \mathrm{N}=2.000\ \mathrm{N}. The correct force is larger by the factor 25.92/2.000=12.96.\boxed{25.92/2.000=12.96}.

(c) Restore the units carried by the coefficient.

[k]=[F][v]2=kgms−2m2s−2=kgm−1.[k]=\frac{[F]}{[v]^2}=\frac{\mathrm{kg\,m\,s^{-2}}}{\mathrm{m^2\,s^{-2}}}=\mathrm{kg\,m^{-1}}.

Multiplying the numerical-value equation by newton yields F=kv2,k=0.2592N(m/s)2=0.2592kg/m.F=kv^2,\qquad k=0.2592\ \frac{\mathrm{N}}{(\mathrm{m/s})^2} =\boxed{0.2592\ \mathrm{kg/m}}. The unit follows from force divided by speed squared. The original 0.0200 is a pure number because its equation divides both physical quantities by stated units. Its corresponding physical coefficient is 0.0200N/(km/h)20.0200\ \mathrm{N/(km/h)^2}, which equals the kk above.

(d) Convert the coefficient; do not merely rename it.

km/h\mathrm{km/h} and m/s\mathrm{m/s} are different-sized units. Replacing the label while retaining 0.0200 changes the physical coefficient to 0.0200kg/m0.0200\ \mathrm{kg/m}, reducing it by a factor of 12.96. A correct conversion preserves kk and changes both its numerical value and its unit representation together.