Newtonian Mechanics — Question 9

Section 5-1 · Physics pages 628–629

Question 9 Constrain a model with multiple observations At t=0, 1 and 2 s a cart is at x=0, 2 and 6 m. A model assumes constant acceleration. An independent observation at 3 s gives x=11 m, with all data exact for this exercise. t (s) x (m) (0, 0) (1, 2) (2, 6) test (3, 11) Filled markers determine the fit; the open marker tests it independently. (a) Infer initial velocity and acceleration from the first three observations. (b) Predict x at 3 s and compare. (c) What does the disagreement establish, and what does it not establish?
Show solutionHide solution
Question 9 - Solution Constrain a model with multiple observations t (s) x (m) (0, 0) (1, 2) (2, 6) test (3, 11) (a) Solve the two increments. v0 + 1 2a = 2, 2v0 + 2a = 6 ⇒ a = 2, v0 = 1 (SI) v0 + 1 2a = 2 and 2v0 + 2a = 6 in SI numerical values. Thus a = 2 m/s2 and v0 = 1 m/s. (b) Use a withheld observation. xfit(3) = 3 + 9 = 12 m, r = 11 −12 = −1 m The model predicts x(3) = 3 + 9 = 12 m, one metre larger than the reported 11 m. It cannot fit all four exact records with one constant acceleration. (c) Reject only the tested claim. ∆2x0 = 6 −2(2) + 0 = 2, ∆2x1 = 11 −2(6) + 2 = 1 m This falsifies that constant-acceleration fit under the stated exact-data assumptions. It does not by itself refute Newtonian mechanics, which permits changing interactions and changing acceleration. In a real experiment measurement errors and frame assumptions would also require examination.

Question 9

Constrain a model with multiple observations

At t=0, 1 and 2 s a cart is at x=0, 2 and 6 m. A model assumes constant acceleration. An independent observation at 3 s gives x=11 m, with all data exact for this exercise.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Infer initial velocity and acceleration from the first three observations.

  2. Predict x at 3 s and compare.

  3. What does the disagreement establish, and what does it not establish?

Question 9 - Solution

Constrain a model with multiple observations

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Solve the two increments.

v0+12a=2,2v0+2a=6⇒a=2,v0=1(SI)v_0+\tfrac12a=2,\quad2v_0+2a=6\ \Rightarrow\ \boxed{a=2,\ v_0=1}\quad\text{(SI)} v0+12a=2v_0+\tfrac12a=2 and 2v0+2a=62v_0+2a=6 in SI numerical values. Thus a=2a=2 m/s2^2 and v0=1v_0=1 m/s.

(b) Use a withheld observation.

xfit(3)=3+9=12m,r=11−12=−1mx_{\mathrm{fit}}(3)=3+9=12\,\mathrm m,\quad r=11-12=-1\,\mathrm m The model predicts x(3)=3+9=12x(3)=3+9=12 m, one metre larger than the reported 11 m. It cannot fit all four exact records with one constant acceleration.

(c) Reject only the tested claim.

Δ2x0=6−2(2)+0=2,Δ2x1=11−2(6)+2=1m\Delta^2x_0=6-2(2)+0=2,\quad\Delta^2x_1=11-2(6)+2=1\quad\mathrm m This falsifies that constant-acceleration fit under the stated exact-data assumptions. It does not by itself refute Newtonian mechanics, which permits changing interactions and changing acceleration. In a real experiment measurement errors and frame assumptions would also require examination.