Newtonian Mechanics — Question 6

Section 5-1 · Physics pages 622–623

Question 6 An idealization is testable against a tolerance A simplified model predicts 100 mm of displacement. Including a measured weak air effect changes the prediction to 99.6 mm. Required agreement is within 0.2 mm for experiment A and within 1 mm for experiment B. x (mm) A: 100 ± 0.2 B: 100 ± 1 99 101 99.6 100 The bars show the two tolerance intervals about the simple prediction. (a) Find the absolute and fractional discrepancy relative to the simple prediction. (b) For which experiment is omitting this effect within the stated tolerance? (c) Does agreement at one condition establish that the effect is always negligible?
Show solutionHide solution
Question 6 - Solution An idealization is testable against a tolerance x (mm) A: 100 ± 0.2 B: 100 ± 1 99 101 99.6 100 (a) Quantify the omission. δ = |100 −99.6| = 0.4 mm, ϵ = 0.4 100 = 0.004 = 0.4% The discrepancy is 0.4 mm, with fraction 0.4/100 = 0.004 = 0.4%. This is a model comparison, not automatically a statistical uncertainty. (b) Use the actual acceptance scale. δ > τA = 0.2 mm, δ < τB = 1 mm It exceeds A’s 0.2 mm tolerance but lies within B’s 1 mm tolerance. The same approximation can be inadequate for one purpose and adequate for another. (c) Restrict the conclusion to tested conditions. Required over domain D : max u∈D |xsimple(u) −xrefined(u)| ≤τ Changing speed, duration or geometry may change the omitted effect. Adequacy at this condition does not establish universal validity. Check the size of the omitted contribution over the intended operating range.

Question 6

An idealization is testable against a tolerance

A simplified model predicts 100 mm of displacement. Including a measured weak air effect changes the prediction to 99.6 mm. Required agreement is within 0.2 mm for experiment A and within 1 mm for experiment B.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Find the absolute and fractional discrepancy relative to the simple prediction.

  2. For which experiment is omitting this effect within the stated tolerance?

  3. Does agreement at one condition establish that the effect is always negligible?

Question 6 - Solution

An idealization is testable against a tolerance

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Quantify the omission.

δ=|100−99.6|=0.4mm,ϵ=0.4100=0.004=0.4%\delta=|100-99.6|=0.4\,\mathrm{mm},\quad \boxed{\epsilon=\frac{0.4}{100}=0.004=0.4\%} The discrepancy is 0.40.4 mm, with fraction 0.4/100=0.004=0.4%0.4/100=0.004=0.4\%. This is a model comparison, not automatically a statistical uncertainty.

(b) Use the actual acceptance scale.

δ>τA=0.2mm,δ<τB=1mm\delta>\tau_A=0.2\,\mathrm{mm},\qquad\delta<\tau_B=1\,\mathrm{mm} It exceeds A’s 0.2 mm tolerance but lies within B’s 1 mm tolerance. The same approximation can be inadequate for one purpose and adequate for another.

(c) Restrict the conclusion to tested conditions.

Required over domain D:maxu∈D|xsimple(u)−xrefined(u)|≤τ\text{Required over domain }D:\quad\max_{u\in D}|x_{\mathrm{simple}}(u)-x_{\mathrm{refined}}(u)|\le\tau Changing speed, duration or geometry may change the omitted effect. Adequacy at this condition does not establish universal validity. Check the size of the omitted contribution over the intended operating range.