A Pause for Reflection — Question 8

Section 44-9 · Physics pages 7466–7467

Question 8 A null rare-decay search constrains a branching fraction rather than proving zero A search observes zero candidates with negligible background from 108 parent decays and efficiency .25. For a Poisson signal, the probability of zero is e−µ. source detector r Schematic; labels, not drawing lengths, specify the data. (a) Derive a one-sided 90 percent upper bound on the branching fraction. (b) If an additional invisible decay mode doubles the total width while the searched partial width stays fixed, find how the branching fraction and expected yield change.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 8 - Solution A null rare-decay search constrains a branching fraction rather than proving zero source detector r (a) Method and calculation e−µ90 = .10 ⇒µ90 = ln 10. B90 = ln 10/(.25 × 108) = 9.21034 × 10−8 . (b) Interpretation and further calculation B = Γs/Γtotal, Γtotal →2Γtotal. B →B/2, µ = NϵB →µ/2 . Physical check The bound depends on the statistical model and selection efficiency. No observed events does not establish an exactly forbidden channel.

Question 8

A null rare-decay search constrains a branching fraction rather than proving zero

A search observes zero candidates with negligible background from 10810^8 parent decays and efficiency .25. For a Poisson signal, the probability of zero is e−μe^{-\mu}.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Derive a one-sided 90 percent upper bound on the branching fraction.

  2. If an additional invisible decay mode doubles the total width while the searched partial width stays fixed, find how the branching fraction and expected yield change.

Question 8 - Solution

A null rare-decay search constrains a branching fraction rather than proving zero

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

e−μ90=.10⇒μ90=ln⁡10.e^{-\mu_{90}}=.10\Rightarrow\mu_{90}=\ln10.B90=ln⁡10/(.25×108)=9.21034×10−8.\boxed{B_{90}=\ln10/(.25\times10^8)=9.21034\times10^{-8}}.

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

B=Γs/Γtotal,Γtotal→2Γtotal.B=\Gamma_s/\Gamma_{\mathrm{total}},\quad\Gamma_{\mathrm{total}}\to2\Gamma_{\mathrm{total}}.B→B/2,μ=NϵB→μ/2.\boxed{B\to B/2,\quad\mu=N\epsilon B\to\mu/2}.

Physical check

The bound depends on the statistical model and selection efficiency. No observed events does not establish an exactly forbidden channel.