Thermonuclear Fusion in the Sun and Other Stars — Question 3

Section 43-6 · Physics pages 7256–7257

Question 3 Solar neutrino number flux follows an inverse-square geometry A star completes 9.20 × 1037 helium-production cycles each second and emits two neutrinos per cycle isotropically. An observer is 1.50 × 1011 m away. Ignore absorption between source and observer. star observer r Schematic; labels, not drawing lengths, specify the data. (a) Find total neutrino number flux in both m−2s−1 and cm−2s−1. (b) If electron-neutrino survival probability is .550, find electron-flavor flux and explain why total flux is not reduced by flavor conversion.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 3 - Solution Solar neutrino number flux follows an inverse-square geometry star observer r (a) Method and calculation ˙Nν = 2(9.20 × 1037) = 1.84 × 1038 s−1 . Φall = ˙Nν 4πr2 = 6.50767 × 1014 m−2s−1 = 6.50767 × 1010 cm−2s−1 . (b) Interpretation and further calculation Φe = .550Φall = 3.57922 × 1010 cm−2s−1 . Φe + Φµ + Φτ = Φall for conversion among active flavors. Physical check A flavor-selective detector does not directly measure total flux. Oscillation changes flavor populations without removing neutrinos in this model.

Question 3

Solar neutrino number flux follows an inverse-square geometry

A star completes 9.20×10379.20\times10^{37} helium-production cycles each second and emits two neutrinos per cycle isotropically. An observer is 1.50×10111.50\times10^{11} m away. Ignore absorption between source and observer.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Find total neutrino number flux in both m−2s−1\,\mathrm{m^{-2}s^{-1}} and cm−2s−1\,\mathrm{cm^{-2}s^{-1}}.

  2. If electron-neutrino survival probability is .550, find electron-flavor flux and explain why total flux is not reduced by flavor conversion.

Question 3 - Solution

Solar neutrino number flux follows an inverse-square geometry

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

Ṅν=2(9.20×1037)=1.84×1038s−1.\boxed{\dot N_\nu=2(9.20\times10^{37})=1.84\times10^{38}\,\mathrm{s^{-1}}}.Φall=Ṅν4πr2=6.50767×1014m−2s−1=6.50767×1010cm−2s−1.\boxed{\Phi_{\mathrm{all}}=\frac{\dot N_\nu}{4\pi r^2}=6.50767\times10^{14}\,\mathrm{m^{-2}s^{-1}}=6.50767\times10^{10}\,\mathrm{cm^{-2}s^{-1}}}.

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

Φe=.550Φall=3.57922×1010cm−2s−1.\boxed{\Phi_e=.550\Phi_{\mathrm{all}}=3.57922\times10^{10}\,\mathrm{cm^{-2}s^{-1}}}.Φe+Φμ+Φτ=Φallfor conversion among active flavors.\boxed{\Phi_e+\Phi_\mu+\Phi_\tau=\Phi_{\mathrm{all}}}\quad\text{for conversion among active flavors}.

Physical check

A flavor-selective detector does not directly measure total flux. Oscillation changes flavor populations without removing neutrinos in this model.