Nuclear Fission: The Basic Process — Question 3

Section 43-1 · Physics pages 7156–7157

Question 3 The binding-energy curve predicts the sign of a nuclear split A schematic parent with A=240 has binding energy per nucleon 7.60 MeV. It splits into two A=120 fragments, each with binding energy per nucleon 8.40 MeV. In this model there are no free neutrons and proton and neutron totals are unchanged. A B/A 120 240 Schematic; labels, not drawing lengths, specify the data. (a) Compute the total binding before and after the split and the released energy. (b) A proposed reverse fusion joins the same fragments. Determine its Q value and explain why a barrier and an endothermic threshold are different concepts.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 3 - Solution The binding-energy curve predicts the sign of a nuclear split A B/A 120 240 (a) Method and calculation Bi = 240(7.60) = 1824 MeV, Bf = 2(120)(8.40) = 2016 MeV . Q = (Mi −Mf)c2 = Bf −Bi ⇒Q = 192 MeV . (b) Interpretation and further calculation Qreverse = Bi −Bf = −192 MeV . Eavailable,cm = Kcm + Qreverse ≥0 ⇒Kcm ≥192 MeV . Physical check This inequality is only an energy requirement. A dynamical Coulomb/deformation barrier can further suppress a reaction even when its Q value is positive.

Question 3

The binding-energy curve predicts the sign of a nuclear split

A schematic parent with A=240 has binding energy per nucleon 7.60 MeV. It splits into two A=120 fragments, each with binding energy per nucleon 8.40 MeV. In this model there are no free neutrons and proton and neutron totals are unchanged.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Compute the total binding before and after the split and the released energy.

  2. A proposed reverse fusion joins the same fragments. Determine its Q value and explain why a barrier and an endothermic threshold are different concepts.

Question 3 - Solution

The binding-energy curve predicts the sign of a nuclear split

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

Bi=240(7.60)=1824MeV,Bf=2(120)(8.40)=2016MeV.\boxed{B_i=240(7.60)=1824\,\mathrm{MeV},\quad B_f=2(120)(8.40)=2016\,\mathrm{MeV}}.Q=(Mi−Mf)c2=Bf−Bi⇒Q=192MeV.Q=(M_i-M_f)c^2=B_f-B_i\Rightarrow\boxed{Q=192\,\mathrm{MeV}}.

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

Qreverse=Bi−Bf=−192MeV.\boxed{Q_{\mathrm{reverse}}=B_i-B_f=-192\,\mathrm{MeV}}.Eavailable,cm=Kcm+Qreverse≥0⇒Kcm≥192MeV.E_{\mathrm{available,cm}}=K_{\mathrm{cm}}+Q_{\mathrm{reverse}}\ge0\Rightarrow\boxed{K_{\mathrm{cm}}\ge192\,\mathrm{MeV}}.

Physical check

This inequality is only an energy requirement. A dynamical Coulomb/deformation barrier can further suppress a reaction even when its Q value is positive.