The Light-Emitting Diode (LED) — Question 2

Section 41-9 · Physics pages 6954–6955

Question 2 A narrow energy spectrum maps to a wavelength width An LED emits near E0 = 2.00 eV with small energy full width at half maximum ∆E = .0800 eV. Use hc = 1240 eV nm and neglect line-shape changes to first order. E SE Schematic; labels, not drawing lengths, specify the data. (a) Derive the first-order relation between energy and wavelength widths. (b) Evaluate the central wavelength and wavelength width, then compare the exact wavelength interval corresponding to E0 ± ∆E/2.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 2 - Solution A narrow energy spectrum maps to a wavelength width E SE (a) Method and calculation λ = hc/E, dλ/dE = −hc/E2. ∆λ ≃(hc/E2 0)∆E, ∆λ/λ0 ≃∆E/E0 . (b) Interpretation and further calculation λ0 = 620 nm, ∆λ ≃24.8 nm . λ(1.96) −λ(2.04) = 632.653 −607.843 = 24.810 nm . Physical check The exact interval is slightly asymmetric in wavelength. A spectral density also transforms with a Jacobian, so its exact wavelength FWHM need not equal this endpoint interval.

Question 2

A narrow energy spectrum maps to a wavelength width

An LED emits near E0=2.00eVE_0=2.00\,\mathrm{eV} with small energy full width at half maximum ΔE=.0800eV\Delta E=.0800\,\mathrm{eV}. Use hc=1240eVnmhc=1240\,\mathrm{eV\,nm} and neglect line-shape changes to first order.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Derive the first-order relation between energy and wavelength widths.

  2. Evaluate the central wavelength and wavelength width, then compare the exact wavelength interval corresponding to E0±ΔE/2E_0\pm\Delta E/2.

Question 2 - Solution

A narrow energy spectrum maps to a wavelength width

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

λ=hc/E,dλ/dE=−hc/E2.\lambda=hc/E,\quad d\lambda/dE=-hc/E^2.Δλ≃(hc/E02)ΔE,Δλ/λ0≃ΔE/E0.\boxed{\Delta\lambda\simeq(hc/E_0^2)\Delta E,\quad\Delta\lambda/\lambda_0\simeq\Delta E/E_0}.

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

λ0=620nm,Δλ≃24.8nm.\boxed{\lambda_0=620\,\mathrm{nm},\quad\Delta\lambda\simeq24.8\,\mathrm{nm}}.λ(1.96)−λ(2.04)=632.653−607.843=24.810nm.\boxed{\lambda(1.96)-\lambda(2.04)=632.653-607.843=24.810\,\mathrm{nm}}.

Physical check

The exact interval is slightly asymmetric in wavelength. A spectral density also transforms with a Jacobian, so its exact wavelength FWHM need not equal this endpoint interval.