Building the Periodic Table — Question 5

Section 40-8 · Physics pages 6720–6721

Question 5 A simple pairing model predicts when an orbital splitting overcomes Hund filling Two electrons occupy two spatial orbitals of energies 0 and ∆> 0. In a supplied model, pairing both in the lower orbital costs interaction energy U; placing one in each with parallel spins costs ∆+ U′ −J, where J > 0 is an exchange lowering. 0 ∆ ∆E Schematic; labels, not drawing lengths, specify the data. (a) Derive the criterion for the parallel-spin state to be lower. (b) For U = 4.0 eV, U′ = 2.8 eV and J = .6 eV, identify the lower state at ∆= 1.0 and 2.5 eV.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 5 - Solution A simple pairing model predicts when an orbital splitting overcomes Hund filling 0 ∆ ∆E (a) Method and calculation Epair = U, Eparallel = ∆+ U′ −J. Eparallel < Epair ⇒∆< U −U′ + J . (b) Interpretation and further calculation ∆c = 4.0 −2.8 + .6 = 1.8 eV . ∆= 1.0 : Eparallel = 3.2 < U; ∆= 2.5 : Epair = 4.0 < 4.7 . Physical check Both states obey exclusion. The competition between orbital splitting, direct repulsion, and exchange determines the spin state in this explicitly simplified model.

Question 5

A simple pairing model predicts when an orbital splitting overcomes Hund filling

Two electrons occupy two spatial orbitals of energies 0 and Δ>0\Delta>0. In a supplied model, pairing both in the lower orbital costs interaction energy U; placing one in each with parallel spins costs Δ+U′−J\Delta+U\prime-J, where J>0J>0 is an exchange lowering.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Derive the criterion for the parallel-spin state to be lower.

  2. For U=4.0eVU=4.0\,\mathrm{eV}, U′=2.8eVU\prime=2.8\,\mathrm{eV} and J=.6eVJ=.6\,\mathrm{eV}, identify the lower state at Δ=1.0\Delta=1.0 and 2.5eV2.5\,\mathrm{eV}.

Question 5 - Solution

A simple pairing model predicts when an orbital splitting overcomes Hund filling

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

Epair=U,Eparallel=Δ+U′−J.E_{\mathrm{pair}}=U,\quad E_{\mathrm{parallel}}=\Delta+U\prime-J.Eparallel<Epair⇒Δ<U−U′+J.E_{\mathrm{parallel}}<E_{\mathrm{pair}}\Rightarrow\boxed{\Delta<U-U\prime+J}.

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

Δc=4.0−2.8+.6=1.8eV.\Delta_c=4.0-2.8+.6=\boxed{1.8\,\mathrm{eV}}.Δ=1.0:Eparallel=3.2<U;Δ=2.5:Epair=4.0<4.7.\boxed{\Delta=1.0:\ E_{\mathrm{parallel}}=3.2<U;\qquad\Delta=2.5:\ E_{\mathrm{pair}}=4.0<4.7}.

Physical check

Both states obey exclusion. The competition between orbital splitting, direct repulsion, and exchange determines the spin state in this explicitly simplified model.