Average Acceleration and Instantaneous Acceleration — Question 9

Section 4-3 · Physics pages 508–509

Question 9 Infer a constant acceleration from two velocity records A particle is known to have constant acceleration. At 1 s its velocity is (5, −2) m/s; at 4 s it is (−1, 7) m/s. Its position at 1 s is (2, 3) m. t (s) v (m/s) vx = 5 vx = −1 vy = −2 vy = 7 audit vy = 2 1 2 4 Filled: x component; open: y component. Lines test constant acceleration; square marks the disputed y sample. (a) Find the acceleration and initial velocity at zero. (b) Predict the position at 4 s. (c) An additional record says velocity at 2 s is (3, 2) m/s. Is it consistent with the same constant-acceleration model?
Show solutionHide solution
Question 9 - Solution Infer a constant acceleration from two velocity records t (s) v (m/s) vx = 5 vx = −1 vy = −2 vy = 7 audit vy = 2 1 2 4 (a) Use the measured velocity difference.⃗ a = (−1, 7) −(5, −2) 3 = (−2, 3) m/s2 ,⃗ v0 = (5, −2) −(−2, 3) = (7, −5) m/s The change is (−6, 9) m/s over 3 s, so⃗a = (−2, 3) m/s2. Extrapolating back from 1 s gives⃗ v(0) = (7, −5) m/s. Constant acceleration is the assumption permitting that extrapolation. (b) Use elapsed time from the known position.⃗ r(4) = (2, 3) + 3(5, −2) + 1 2(9)(−2, 3) = (8, 10.5) m From 1 to 4 s, ∆t = 3 s. The displacement is (5, −2)(3) + 1 2(−2, 3)(9) = (6, 7.5) m. Therefore⃗ r(4 s) = (8, 10.5) m. Using 4 s in this interval equation would misidentify its starting time. (c) Compare both predicted components.⃗ vpredicted(2) = (5, −2) + (−2, 3) = (3, 1) m/s̸ = (3, 2) m/s The model predicts⃗v(2 s) = (5, −2) + (−2, 3) = (3, 1) m/s. The reported y component differs by 1 m/s, so the three exact records cannot all belong to the same constant-acceleration motion. Agreement in x alone is insufficient.

Question 9

Infer a constant acceleration from two velocity records

A particle is known to have constant acceleration. At 1 s its velocity is (5,−2)(5,-2) m/s; at 4 s it is (−1,7)(-1,7) m/s. Its position at 1 s is (2,3)(2,3) m.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Find the acceleration and initial velocity at zero.

  2. Predict the position at 4 s.

  3. An additional record says velocity at 2 s is (3,2)(3,2) m/s. Is it consistent with the same constant-acceleration model?

Question 9 - Solution

Infer a constant acceleration from two velocity records

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Use the measured velocity difference.

a→=(−1,7)−(5,−2)3=(−2,3)m/s2,v→0=(5,−2)−(−2,3)=(7,−5)m/s\vec a=\frac{(-1,7)-(5,-2)}3=\boxed{(-2,3)\,\mathrm{m/s^2}},\quad\vec v_0=(5,-2)-(-2,3)=(7,-5)\,\mathrm{m/s} The change is (−6,9)(-6,9) m/s over 3 s, so a→=(−2,3)\vec a=(-2,3) m/s2^2. Extrapolating back from 1 s gives v→(0)=(7,−5)\vec v(0)=(7,-5) m/s. Constant acceleration is the assumption permitting that extrapolation.

(b) Use elapsed time from the known position.

r→(4)=(2,3)+3(5,−2)+12(9)(−2,3)=(8,10.5)m\vec r(4)=(2,3)+3(5,-2)+\tfrac12(9)(-2,3)=(8,10.5)\,\mathrm m From 1 to 4 s, Δt=3\Delta t=3 s. The displacement is (5,−2)(3)+12(−2,3)(9)=(6,7.5)(5,-2)(3)+\tfrac12(-2,3)(9)=(6,7.5) m. Therefore r→(4s)=(8,10.5)\vec r(4\ \mathrm s)=(8,10.5) m. Using 4 s in this interval equation would misidentify its starting time.

(c) Compare both predicted components.

v→predicted(2)=(5,−2)+(−2,3)=(3,1)m/s≠(3,2)m/s\vec v_{\mathrm{predicted}}(2)=(5,-2)+(-2,3)=(3,1)\,\mathrm{m/s}\ne(3,2)\,\mathrm{m/s} The model predicts v→(2s)=(5,−2)+(−2,3)=(3,1)\vec v(2\ \mathrm s)=(5,-2)+(-2,3)=(3,1) m/s. The reported y component differs by 1 m/s, so the three exact records cannot all belong to the same constant-acceleration motion. Agreement in x alone is insufficient.