Average Velocity and Instantaneous Velocity — Question 6

Section 4-2 · Physics pages 482–483

Question 6 A symmetric velocity estimate can still be biased Let u = t/(1 s) and⃗r(t) = (u3, 2u) m. Estimate velocity at 2 s from the two measurements at 2 s −h and 2 s + h, using their displacement divided by 2h. u = t/(1 s) x (m) 2 −δ 2 2 + δ The x-coordinate curve and a symmetric secant; illustrated with delta=0.5. The y-coordinate is linear. (a) Find the exact instantaneous velocity at 2 s. (b) Derive the symmetric estimate in terms of δ = h/(1 s) and evaluate it for h = 0.5 s. (c) How does the error change if h is halved? Does symmetry guarantee exactness for every trajectory?
Show solutionHide solution
Question 6 - Solution A symmetric velocity estimate can still be biased u = t/(1 s) x (m) 2 −δ 2 2 + δ (a) Differentiate the cubic coordinate.⃗ v = ( 3u2, 2 ) m/s ⇒⃗ v(2 s) = (12, 2) m/s⃗ v = (3u2, 2) m/s, giving (12, 2) m/s at 2 s. The nonlinear x coordinate is the potential source of finite-interval error. (b) Expand the endpoint difference. (2 + δ)3 −(2 −δ)3 2δ = 12 + δ2,⃗ vh = (12.25, 2) m/s [(2 + δ)3 −(2 −δ)3]/(2δ) = 12 + δ2. Thus the estimate is (12 + δ2, 2) m/s. For h = 0.5 s, it is (12.25, 2) m/s, with x error +0.25 m/s. (c) Use the error law rather than assuming cancellation. ϵx(h) = δ2 m/s, ϵx(h/2) = 1 4ϵx(h) = 0.0625 m/s Halving h divides δ2 by four, leaving x error 0.0625 m/s. Symmetry cancels some terms but not the cubic contribution. The estimate approaches the derivative as h →0; finite symmetric measurements are not automatically exact.

Question 6

A symmetric velocity estimate can still be biased

Let u=t/(1s)u=t/(1\ \mathrm s) and r→(t)=(u3,2u)\vec r(t)=(u^3,2u) m. Estimate velocity at 2 s from the two measurements at 2s−h2\ \mathrm s-h and 2s+h2\ \mathrm s+h, using their displacement divided by 2h2h.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Find the exact instantaneous velocity at 2 s.

  2. Derive the symmetric estimate in terms of δ=h/(1s)\delta=h/(1\ \mathrm s) and evaluate it for h=0.5h=0.5 s.

  3. How does the error change if h is halved? Does symmetry guarantee exactness for every trajectory?

Question 6 - Solution

A symmetric velocity estimate can still be biased

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Differentiate the cubic coordinate.

v→=(3u2,2)m/s⇒v→(2s)=(12,2)m/s\vec v=\left(3u^2,2\right)\,\mathrm{m/s}\ \Rightarrow\ \boxed{\vec v(2\,\mathrm s)=(12,2)\,\mathrm{m/s}} v→=(3u2,2)\vec v=(3u^2,2) m/s, giving (12,2)(12,2) m/s at 2 s. The nonlinear x coordinate is the potential source of finite-interval error.

(b) Expand the endpoint difference.

(2+δ)3−(2−δ)32δ=12+δ2,v→h=(12.25,2)m/s\frac{(2+\delta)^3-(2-\delta)^3}{2\delta}=12+\delta^2,\quad\vec v_h=(12.25,2)\,\mathrm{m/s} [(2+δ)3−(2−δ)3]/(2δ)=12+δ2[(2+\delta)^3-(2-\delta)^3]/(2\delta)=12+\delta^2. Thus the estimate is (12+δ2,2)(12+\delta^2,2) m/s. For h=0.5h=0.5 s, it is (12.25,2)(12.25,2) m/s, with x error +0.25+0.25 m/s.

(c) Use the error law rather than assuming cancellation.

ϵx(h)=δ2m/s,ϵx(h/2)=14ϵx(h)=0.0625m/s\epsilon_x(h)=\delta^2\,\mathrm{m/s},\quad\epsilon_x(h/2)=\frac14\epsilon_x(h)=0.0625\,\mathrm{m/s} Halving h divides δ2\delta^2 by four, leaving x error 0.0625 m/s. Symmetry cancels some terms but not the cubic contribution. The estimate approaches the derivative as h→0h\to0; finite symmetric measurements are not automatically exact.