An Electron in a Finite Well — Question 3

Section 39-4 · Physics pages 6476–6477

Question 3 Numerical intersections determine the two bound energies of a moderate well A symmetric finite well has V = 0 for |x| < a and V = V0 > 0 outside. Bound energies satisfy 0 < E < V0. Define k = √ 2mE/ℏ, κ = √ 2m(V0 −E)/ℏ, z = ka, w = κa and z0 = a√2mV0/ℏ. Let z0 = 2.00. Solve the even equation z tan z = √ 4 −z2 and odd equation −z cot z = √ 4 −z2. A calculator or numerical root finder may be used. x V0 −a a Schematic; labels, not drawing lengths, specify the data. (a) Locate the two roots on their physical branches. (b) Find both energies as fractions of V0 and their binding energies relative to the continuum.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 3 - Solution Numerical intersections determine the two bound energies of a moderate well x V0 −a a (a) Method and calculation 0 < ze < π/2 : ze = 1.02986653 . π/2 < zo < 2 : zo = 1.89549427 . (b) Interpretation and further calculation E/V0 = z2/z2 0 ⇒Ee/V0 = .265156, Eo/V0 = .898225 . (V0 −Ee)/V0 = .734844, (V0 −Eo)/V0 = .101775 . Physical check The odd state is closer to the continuum and therefore has a longer decay length. A root across a tangent pole would not be a valid numerical solution.

Question 3

Numerical intersections determine the two bound energies of a moderate well

A symmetric finite well has V=0V=0 for |x|<a|x|<a and V=V0>0V=V_0>0 outside. Bound energies satisfy 0<E<V00<E<V_0. Define k=2mE/ℏk=\sqrt{2mE}/\hbar, κ=2m(V0−E)/ℏ\kappa=\sqrt{2m(V_0-E)}/\hbar, z=kaz=ka, w=κaw=\kappa a and z0=a2mV0/ℏz_0=a\sqrt{2mV_0}/\hbar. Let z0=2.00z_0=2.00. Solve the even equation ztan⁡z=4−z2z\tan z=\sqrt{4-z^2} and odd equation −zcot⁡z=4−z2-z\cot z=\sqrt{4-z^2}. A calculator or numerical root finder may be used.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Locate the two roots on their physical branches.

  2. Find both energies as fractions of V0V_0 and their binding energies relative to the continuum.

Question 3 - Solution

Numerical intersections determine the two bound energies of a moderate well

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

0<ze<π/2:ze=1.02986653.0<z_e<\pi/2:\quad\boxed{z_e=1.02986653}.π/2<zo<2:zo=1.89549427.\pi/2<z_o<2:\quad\boxed{z_o=1.89549427}.

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

E/V0=z2/z02⇒Ee/V0=.265156,Eo/V0=.898225.E/V_0=z^2/z_0^2\Rightarrow\boxed{E_e/V_0=.265156,\quad E_o/V_0=.898225}.(V0−Ee)/V0=.734844,(V0−Eo)/V0=.101775.\boxed{(V_0-E_e)/V_0=.734844,\quad(V_0-E_o)/V_0=.101775}.

Physical check

The odd state is closer to the continuum and therefore has a longer decay length. A root across a tangent pole would not be a valid numerical solution.