Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle — Question 10

Section 38-7 · Physics pages 6390–6391

Question 10 Exponential lifetime produces a Lorentzian linewidth rather than a finite rms energy spread In an ideal decay model the amplitude is A(t) = Θ(t)e−t/(2τ)e−iω0t, so survival probability decays as e−t/τ. The spectral amplitude is proportional to R ∞ 0 A(t)eiωtdt. Take τ = 5.00 ns and ℏ= 6.582 × 10−16 eV s. ω 1/τ ω0 Schematic; labels, not drawing lengths, specify the data. (a) Derive the line shape and its full width at half maximum in energy. (b) Calculate the linewidth and determine whether it can be identified with a finite energy standard deviation for this ideal Lorentzian.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 10 - Solution Exponential lifetime produces a Lorentzian linewidth rather than a finite rms energy spread ω 1/τ ω0 (a) Method and calculation eA(ω) ∝ 1 1/(2τ) −i(ω −ω0), S(ω) ∝ 1 (ω −ω0)2 + [1/(2τ)]2 . S = Smax/2 at |ω −ω0| = 1/(2τ) ⇒ ΓE = ℏ/τ . (b) Interpretation and further calculation ΓE = 1.3164 × 10−7 eV . S(ω) ∼(ω −ω0)−2 ⇒ Z (ω −ω0)2S(ω)dω = ∞. Physical check The ideal Lorentzian has a finite FWHM but no finite variance. This model does not establish a universal rule equating measurement duration with a position-momentum-style uncertainty variable.

Question 10

Exponential lifetime produces a Lorentzian linewidth rather than a finite rms energy spread

In an ideal decay model the amplitude is A(t)=Θ(t)e−t/(2τ)e−iω0tA(t)=\Theta(t)e^{-t/(2\tau)}e^{-i\omega_0t}, so survival probability decays as e−t/τe^{-t/\tau}. The spectral amplitude is proportional to ∫0∞A(t)eiωtdt\int_0^\infty A(t)e^{i\omega t}dt. Take τ=5.00ns\tau=5.00\,\mathrm{ns} and ℏ=6.582×10−16eVs\hbar=6.582\times10^{-16}\,\mathrm{eV\,s}.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Derive the line shape and its full width at half maximum in energy.

  2. Calculate the linewidth and determine whether it can be identified with a finite energy standard deviation for this ideal Lorentzian.

Question 10 - Solution

Exponential lifetime produces a Lorentzian linewidth rather than a finite rms energy spread

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

Ã(ω)∝11/(2τ)−i(ω−ω0),S(ω)∝1(ω−ω0)2+[1/(2τ)]2.\widetilde A(\omega)\propto\frac1{1/(2\tau)-i(\omega-\omega_0)},\quad S(\omega)\propto\frac1{(\omega-\omega_0)^2+[1/(2\tau)]^2}.S=Smax/2 at |ω−ω0|=1/(2τ)⇒ΓE=ℏ/τ.S=S_{\max}/2\text{ at }|\omega-\omega_0|=1/(2\tau)\quad\Rightarrow\quad\boxed{\Gamma_E=\hbar/\tau}.

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

ΓE=1.3164×10−7eV.\boxed{\Gamma_E=1.3164\times10^{-7}\,\mathrm{eV}}.S(ω)∼(ω−ω0)−2⇒∫(ω−ω0)2S(ω)dω=∞.S(\omega)\sim(\omega-\omega_0)^{-2}\quad\Rightarrow\quad\boxed{\int(\omega-\omega_0)^2S(\omega)d\omega=\infty}.

Physical check

The ideal Lorentzian has a finite FWHM but no finite variance. This model does not establish a universal rule equating measurement duration with a position-momentum-style uncertainty variable.