Diffraction by Organized Layers — Question 9

Section 36-9 · Physics pages 6028–6029

Question 9 Instrumental broadening must be removed before estimating crystallite size Use the supplied Scherrer model T = Kλ/(B cos θ), where B is sample FWHM in 2θ radians and K = 0.90. Assume Gaussian widths, so B2 = B2 measured −B2 instrument. A peak at 2θ = 60◦has measured FWHM 0.200◦, instrument FWHM 0.120◦, and λ = 0.154 nm. Neglect strain broadening. 2θ I Schematic; labels, not drawing lengths, specify the data. (a) Find the corrected width and estimated coherent crystallite thickness. (b) Calculate the size estimate obtained if instrumental broadening were ignored and explain the direction of the bias.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 9 - Solution Instrumental broadening must be removed before estimating crystallite size 2θ I (a) Method and calculation B = √ 0.2002 −0.1202 deg = 0.160◦= 0.00279253 rad. T = 0.90(0.154 nm) 0.00279253 cos 30◦= 57.3106 nm . (b) Interpretation and further calculation Bmeasured = 0.00349066 rad =⇒Tuncorrected = 45.8485 nm . Tuncorrected/T = B/Bmeasured = 0.80 . Physical check Assigning instrumental width to the sample makes the coherent domain appear too small. This model estimates coherent domain size, not necessarily the full particle size.

Question 9

Instrumental broadening must be removed before estimating crystallite size

Use the supplied Scherrer model T=Kλ/(Bcos⁡θ)T=K\lambda/(B\cos\theta), where B is sample FWHM in 2θ2\theta radians and K=0.90K=0.90. Assume Gaussian widths, so B2=Bmeasured2−Binstrument2B^2=B_{\mathrm{measured}}^2-B_{\mathrm{instrument}}^2. A peak at 2θ=60∘2\theta=60^\circ has measured FWHM 0.200∘0.200^\circ, instrument FWHM 0.120∘0.120^\circ, and λ=0.154nm\lambda=0.154\,\mathrm{nm}. Neglect strain broadening.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Find the corrected width and estimated coherent crystallite thickness.

  2. Calculate the size estimate obtained if instrumental broadening were ignored and explain the direction of the bias.

Question 9 - Solution

Instrumental broadening must be removed before estimating crystallite size

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

B=0.2002−0.1202deg=0.160∘=0.00279253rad.B=\sqrt{0.200^2-0.120^2}\,\mathrm{deg}=0.160^\circ=0.00279253\,\mathrm{rad}.T=0.90(0.154nm)0.00279253cos⁡30∘=57.3106nm.\boxed{T=\frac{0.90(0.154\,\mathrm{nm})}{0.00279253\cos30^\circ}=57.3106\,\mathrm{nm}}.

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

Bmeasured=0.00349066rad⇒Tuncorrected=45.8485nm.B_{\mathrm{measured}}=0.00349066\,\mathrm{rad}\Longrightarrow\boxed{T_{\mathrm{uncorrected}}=45.8485\,\mathrm{nm}}.Tuncorrected/T=B/Bmeasured=0.80.\boxed{T_{\mathrm{uncorrected}}/T=B/B_{\mathrm{measured}}=0.80}.

Physical check

Assigning instrumental width to the sample makes the coherent domain appear too small. This model estimates coherent domain size, not necessarily the full particle size.