Diffraction Gratings — Question 4

Section 36-7 · Physics pages 5978–5979

Question 4 The first-zero width of a principal grating peak scales inversely with slit count A grating has N=400 illuminated slits, spacing d = 2.00 µm, and wavelength 600 nm. Consider principal order m=2. The nearest array zeros occur at phase offsets ∆δ = ±2π/N. d N illuminated slits N = 400 Schematic; labels, not drawing lengths, specify the data. (a) Derive the angular half-width from the principal peak to a nearest zero and evaluate it. (b) Find the full zero-to-zero width and its change when the illuminated slit count doubles.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 4 - Solution The first-zero width of a principal grating peak scales inversely with slit count d N illuminated slits N = 400 (a) Method and calculation δ = 2πd sin θ/λ =⇒∆δ ≃(2πd/λ) cos θm∆θ. sin θ2 = 0.600, ∆θhalf = λ/(Nd cos θ2) = 9.375 × 10−4 rad . (b) Interpretation and further calculation Wθ = 2∆θhalf = 1.875 × 10−3 rad . N →800 =⇒Wθ →9.375 × 10−4 rad . Physical check The width is evaluated locally in angle, so the cosine factor must be retained away from the normal.

Question 4

The first-zero width of a principal grating peak scales inversely with slit count

A grating has N=400 illuminated slits, spacing d=2.00μmd=2.00\,\mu\mathrm m, and wavelength 600nm600\,\mathrm{nm}. Consider principal order m=2. The nearest array zeros occur at phase offsets Δδ=±2π/N\Delta\delta=\pm2\pi/N.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Derive the angular half-width from the principal peak to a nearest zero and evaluate it.

  2. Find the full zero-to-zero width and its change when the illuminated slit count doubles.

Question 4 - Solution

The first-zero width of a principal grating peak scales inversely with slit count

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

δ=2πdsin⁡θ/λ⇒Δδ≃(2πd/λ)cos⁡θmΔθ.\delta=2\pi d\sin\theta/\lambda\Longrightarrow\Delta\delta\simeq(2\pi d/\lambda)\cos\theta_m\Delta\theta.sin⁡θ2=0.600,Δθhalf=λ/(Ndcos⁡θ2)=9.375×10−4rad.\sin\theta_2=0.600,\quad\boxed{\Delta\theta_{\mathrm{half}}=\lambda/(Nd\cos\theta_2)=9.375\times10^{-4}\,\mathrm{rad}}.

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

Wθ=2Δθhalf=1.875×10−3rad.\boxed{W_\theta=2\Delta\theta_{\mathrm{half}}=1.875\times10^{-3}\,\mathrm{rad}}.N→800⇒Wθ→9.375×10−4rad.N\to800\Longrightarrow\boxed{W_\theta\to9.375\times10^{-4}\,\mathrm{rad}}.

Physical check

The width is evaluated locally in angle, so the cosine factor must be retained away from the normal.