Diffraction by a Double Slit — Question 2

Section 36-6 · Physics pages 5954–5955

Question 2 Envelope width and fringe spacing independently determine the aperture geometry A paraxial double-slit pattern at wavelength 600 nm is recorded L = 1.00 m away. The central envelope extends 24.0 mm between its first zeros; nominal interference maxima are separated by 4.80 mm. d P slit width a W = 24.0 mm Schematic; labels, not drawing lengths, specify the data. (a) Infer the width a of each slit and their center spacing d. (b) Count the nominal interference maxima strictly inside the central envelope and find the first positive missing order.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 2 - Solution Envelope width and fringe spacing independently determine the aperture geometry d P slit width a W = 24.0 mm (a) Method and calculation W = 2λL/a =⇒a = 50.0 µm ; p = λL/d =⇒d = 125 µm . d/a = 2.50 ; |m| < d/a =⇒m = −2, −1, 0, 1, 2 . (b) Interpretation and further calculation Missing: mλ/d = peλ/a =⇒m = (5/2)pe. m = 5 first missing, at envelope order pe = 2 . Physical check Nominal interference orders are not exactly the local maxima of the envelope-weighted pattern; they remain useful geometric markers.

Question 2

Envelope width and fringe spacing independently determine the aperture geometry

A paraxial double-slit pattern at wavelength 600nm600\,\mathrm{nm} is recorded L=1.00mL=1.00\,\mathrm m away. The central envelope extends 24.0mm24.0\,\mathrm{mm} between its first zeros; nominal interference maxima are separated by 4.80mm4.80\,\mathrm{mm}.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Infer the width a of each slit and their center spacing d.

  2. Count the nominal interference maxima strictly inside the central envelope and find the first positive missing order.

Question 2 - Solution

Envelope width and fringe spacing independently determine the aperture geometry

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

W=2λL/a⇒a=50.0μm;p=λL/d⇒d=125μm.W=2\lambda L/a\Longrightarrow\boxed{a=50.0\,\mu\mathrm m};\quad p=\lambda L/d\Longrightarrow\boxed{d=125\,\mu\mathrm m}.d/a=2.50;|m|<d/a⇒m=−2,−1,0,1,2.\boxed{d/a=2.50};\quad |m|<d/a\Longrightarrow\boxed{m=-2,-1,0,1,2}.

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

Missing:mλ/d=peλ/a⇒m=(5/2)pe.\text{Missing:}\quad m\lambda/d=p_e\lambda/a\Longrightarrow m=(5/2)p_e.m=5first missing, at envelope order pe=2.\boxed{m=5\ \text{first missing, at envelope order }p_e=2}.

Physical check

Nominal interference orders are not exactly the local maxima of the envelope-weighted pattern; they remain useful geometric markers.