Intensity in Single-Slit Diffraction, Quantitatively — Question 2

Section 36-4 · Physics pages 5914–5915

Question 2 The full width at half maximum is smaller than the first-zero width For I/Ic = (sin β/β)2, the positive central half-maximum root is βh = 1.391557378. Use paraxial screen geometry β = πay/(λL). Let a = 0.200 mm, L = 2.00 m, and λ = 600 nm. β/π I/Ic half height Schematic; labels, not drawing lengths, specify the data. (a) Derive and calculate the full width at half maximum. (b) Compare it with the width between the first zeros and give their ratio.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 2 - Solution The full width at half maximum is smaller than the first-zero width β/π I/Ic half height (a) Method and calculation yh = βhλL πa =⇒W1/2 = 2βh π λL a . W1/2 = 0.885893λL a = 5.31536 mm . (b) Interpretation and further calculation Wzero = 2λL/a = 12.000 mm . W1/2/Wzero = βh/π = 0.442946 . Physical check Quoting a diffraction width without identifying its convention can introduce more than a factor-of-two discrepancy.

Question 2

The full width at half maximum is smaller than the first-zero width

For I/Ic=(sin⁡β/β)2I/I_c=(\sin\beta/\beta)^2, the positive central half-maximum root is βh=1.391557378\beta_h=1.391557378. Use paraxial screen geometry β=πay/(λL)\beta=\pi ay/(\lambda L). Let a=0.200mma=0.200\,\mathrm{mm}, L=2.00mL=2.00\,\mathrm m, and λ=600nm\lambda=600\,\mathrm{nm}.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Derive and calculate the full width at half maximum.

  2. Compare it with the width between the first zeros and give their ratio.

Question 2 - Solution

The full width at half maximum is smaller than the first-zero width

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

yh=βhλLπa⇒W1/2=2βhπλLa.y_h=\frac{\beta_h\lambda L}{\pi a}\Longrightarrow\boxed{W_{1/2}=\frac{2\beta_h}{\pi}\frac{\lambda L}a}.W1/2=0.885893λLa=5.31536mm.\boxed{W_{1/2}=0.885893\frac{\lambda L}a=5.31536\,\mathrm{mm}}.

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

Wzero=2λL/a=12.000mm.\boxed{W_{\mathrm{zero}}=2\lambda L/a=12.000\,\mathrm{mm}}.W1/2/Wzero=βh/π=0.442946.\boxed{W_{1/2}/W_{\mathrm{zero}}=\beta_h/\pi=0.442946}.

Physical check

Quoting a diffraction width without identifying its convention can introduce more than a factor-of-two discrepancy.