Diffraction and the Wave Theory of Light — Question 10

Section 36-1 · Physics pages 5870–5871

Question 10 Subwavelength spatial structure can be evanescent rather than propagating For a monochromatic angular-spectrum component in vacuum, k2 x + k2 z = k2 with k = 2π/λ. Its transverse period is Λ = λ/2, so kx = 2π/Λ. Choose the z dependence that decays away from the aperture. z |E| Schematic; labels, not drawing lengths, specify the data. (a) Find kz and the amplitude decay length. (b) For λ = 600 nm, find the distance over which intensity falls by a factor e−2.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 10 - Solution Subwavelength spatial structure can be evanescent rather than propagating z |E| (a) Method and calculation kx = 2k =⇒k2 z = −3k2 =⇒kz = i √ 3k . eikzz = e− √ 3kz, ℓE = 1/( √ 3k) = λ/(2π √ 3) . (b) Interpretation and further calculation I(z)/I(0) = e−2z/ℓE; I(z)/I(0) = e−2 =⇒z = ℓE. z = 55.1329 nm . Physical check This component decays exponentially and cannot appear as an ordinary far-field ray; the real longitudinal-wave-vector assumption has failed.

Question 10

Subwavelength spatial structure can be evanescent rather than propagating

For a monochromatic angular-spectrum component in vacuum, kx2+kz2=k2k_x^2+k_z^2=k^2 with k=2π/λk=2\pi/\lambda. Its transverse period is Λ=λ/2\Lambda=\lambda/2, so kx=2π/Λk_x=2\pi/\Lambda. Choose the z dependence that decays away from the aperture.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Find kzk_z and the amplitude decay length.

  2. For λ=600nm\lambda=600\,\mathrm{nm}, find the distance over which intensity falls by a factor e−2e^{-2}.

Question 10 - Solution

Subwavelength spatial structure can be evanescent rather than propagating

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

kx=2k⇒kz2=−3k2⇒kz=i3k.k_x=2k\Longrightarrow k_z^2=-3k^2\Longrightarrow\boxed{k_z=i\sqrt3k}.eikzz=e−3kz,ℓE=1/(3k)=λ/(2π3).e^{ik_zz}=e^{-\sqrt3kz},\quad\boxed{\ell_E=1/(\sqrt3k)=\lambda/(2\pi\sqrt3)}.

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

I(z)/I(0)=e−2z/ℓE;I(z)/I(0)=e−2⇒z=ℓE.I(z)/I(0)=e^{-2z/\ell_E};\quad I(z)/I(0)=e^{-2}\Longrightarrow z=\ell_E.z=55.1329nm.\boxed{z=55.1329\,\mathrm{nm}}.

Physical check

This component decays exponentially and cannot appear as an ordinary far-field ray; the real longitudinal-wave-vector assumption has failed.