Interference from Thin Films — Question 10

Section 35-6 · Physics pages 5830–5831

Question 10 An imperfect coating retains reflection even at its optimum thickness A quarter-wave film with nf = 1.40 coats a substrate ns = 1.80 in air at λ0 = 550 nm. At this thickness the exact net amplitude coefficient is r = (r0f −rfs)/(1 −r0frfs), where rij = (ni −nj)/(ni + nj). n0 nf ns t nf = 1.40̸ = √ 1.80 Schematic; labels, not drawing lengths, specify the data. (a) Calculate the thickness and exact residual reflectance R = |r|2. (b) Compare with the uncoated reflectance and calculate the film index that would eliminate reflection at the design wavelength.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 10 - Solution An imperfect coating retains reflection even at its optimum thickness n0 nf ns t nf = 1.40̸ = √ 1.80 (a) Method and calculation t = λ0/(4nf) = 98.2143 nm ; r0f = −1/6, rfs = −1/8. r = −1/6 + 1/8 1 −1/48 = −2 47 =⇒R = 4/2209 = 0.00181077 . (b) Interpretation and further calculation Rbare = (1 −1.8 1 + 1.8 )2 = 4/49 = 0.0816327 . nf,ideal = √n0ns = √ 1.80 = 1.34164 . Physical check The coating greatly lowers reflection but does not cancel it, because its index does not supply the exact amplitude match.

Question 10

An imperfect coating retains reflection even at its optimum thickness

A quarter-wave film with nf=1.40n_f=1.40 coats a substrate ns=1.80n_s=1.80 in air at λ0=550nm\lambda_0=550\,\mathrm{nm}. At this thickness the exact net amplitude coefficient is r=(r0f−rfs)/(1−r0frfs)r=(r_{0f}-r_{fs})/(1-r_{0f}r_{fs}), where rij=(ni−nj)/(ni+nj)r_{ij}=(n_i-n_j)/(n_i+n_j).

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Calculate the thickness and exact residual reflectance ℛ=|r|2\mathcal R=|r|^2.

  2. Compare with the uncoated reflectance and calculate the film index that would eliminate reflection at the design wavelength.

Question 10 - Solution

An imperfect coating retains reflection even at its optimum thickness

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

t=λ0/(4nf)=98.2143nm;r0f=−1/6,rfs=−1/8.\boxed{t=\lambda_0/(4n_f)=98.2143\,\mathrm{nm}};\quad r_{0f}=-1/6,\quad r_{fs}=-1/8.r=−1/6+1/81−1/48=−247⇒ℛ=4/2209=0.00181077.r=\frac{-1/6+1/8}{1-1/48}=-\frac2{47}\Longrightarrow\boxed{\mathcal R=4/2209=0.00181077}.

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

ℛbare=(1−1.81+1.8)2=4/49=0.0816327.\boxed{\mathcal R_{\mathrm{bare}}=\left(\frac{1-1.8}{1+1.8}\right)^2=4/49=0.0816327}.nf,ideal=n0ns=1.80=1.34164.\boxed{n_{f,\mathrm{ideal}}=\sqrt{n_0n_s}=\sqrt{1.80}=1.34164}.

Physical check

The coating greatly lowers reflection but does not cancel it, because its index does not supply the exact amplitude match.