Interference from Thin Films — Question 1

Section 35-6 · Physics pages 5812–5813

Question 1 A free-standing film has one reflection phase reversal A transparent film of index nf = 1.40 is surrounded by air and illuminated normally at vacuum wavelength λ0 = 560 nm. Consider the first two reflected rays. Reflection from lower to higher index adds phase pi; reflection from higher to lower index adds zero. n0 nf ns t air / film / air Schematic; labels, not drawing lengths, specify the data. (a) Find the smallest positive thickness giving a reflected maximum. (b) Find the smallest positive thickness giving a reflected minimum and explain the zero-thickness limit.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 1 - Solution A free-standing film has one reflection phase reversal n0 nf ns t air / film / air (a) Method and calculation δ = 4πnft λ0 + π (mod 2π); maximum : 2nft = (m + 1/2)λ0. tmax,min = λ0/(4nf) = 100 nm . (b) Interpretation and further calculation minimum : 2nft = mλ0 =⇒tmin,positive = λ0/(2nf) = 200 nm . t →0 : δ →π =⇒destructive reflected interference . Physical check For the full lossless symmetric film, zero thickness removes the layer and the exact net reflection vanishes; two-ray amplitudes alone are only an approximation to that limit.

Question 1

A free-standing film has one reflection phase reversal

A transparent film of index nf=1.40n_f=1.40 is surrounded by air and illuminated normally at vacuum wavelength λ0=560nm\lambda_0=560\,\mathrm{nm}. Consider the first two reflected rays. Reflection from lower to higher index adds phase pi; reflection from higher to lower index adds zero.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Find the smallest positive thickness giving a reflected maximum.

  2. Find the smallest positive thickness giving a reflected minimum and explain the zero-thickness limit.

Question 1 - Solution

A free-standing film has one reflection phase reversal

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

δ=4πnftλ0+π(mod⁡2π);maximum:2nft=(m+1/2)λ0.\delta=\frac{4\pi n_ft}{\lambda_0}+\pi\pmod{2\pi};\quad\text{maximum}:\ 2n_ft=(m+1/2)\lambda_0.tmax,min=λ0/(4nf)=100nm.\boxed{t_{\mathrm{max,min}}=\lambda_0/(4n_f)=100\,\mathrm{nm}}.

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

minimum:2nft=mλ0⇒tmin,positive=λ0/(2nf)=200nm.\text{minimum}:\ 2n_ft=m\lambda_0\Longrightarrow\boxed{t_{\mathrm{min,positive}}=\lambda_0/(2n_f)=200\,\mathrm{nm}}.t→0:δ→π⇒destructive reflected interference.t\to0:\quad\delta\to\pi\Longrightarrow\boxed{\text{destructive reflected interference}}.

Physical check

For the full lossless symmetric film, zero thickness removes the layer and the exact net reflection vanishes; two-ray amplitudes alone are only an approximation to that limit.