Intensity in Double-Slit Interference — Question 3

Section 35-5 · Physics pages 5796–5797

Question 3 A neutral-density filter attenuates the field by the square root of its transmission Two initially equal coherent beams each have intensity I0. An ideal neutral-density filter with intensity transmission T = 0.25 is placed over one slit; it adds no phase shift. The polarizations remain parallel. P(y) d L T Schematic; labels, not drawing lengths, specify the data. (a) Calculate the extrema and visibility after inserting the filter. (b) Find the total intensity at quadrature and compare the phase-averaged intensity before and after filtering.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 3 - Solution A neutral-density filter attenuates the field by the square root of its transmission P(y) d L T (a) Method and calculation E′ 2 = √ TE0 = E0/2, I/I0 = 1 + T + 2 √ T cos δ. Imax = 2.25I0, Imin = 0.25I0, V = 2 √ T 1 + T = 0.80 . (b) Interpretation and further calculation δ = π/2 : I = 1.25I0 . ⟨I⟩before = 2I0, ⟨I⟩after = (1 + T)I0 = 1.25I0 . Physical check Using T rather than its square root on the field amplitude would overestimate the loss of interference modulation.

Question 3

A neutral-density filter attenuates the field by the square root of its transmission

Two initially equal coherent beams each have intensity I0I_0. An ideal neutral-density filter with intensity transmission T=0.25T=0.25 is placed over one slit; it adds no phase shift. The polarizations remain parallel.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Calculate the extrema and visibility after inserting the filter.

  2. Find the total intensity at quadrature and compare the phase-averaged intensity before and after filtering.

Question 3 - Solution

A neutral-density filter attenuates the field by the square root of its transmission

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

E2′=TE0=E0/2,I/I0=1+T+2Tcos⁡δ.E_2^\prime=\sqrt T E_0=E_0/2,\quad I/I_0=1+T+2\sqrt T\cos\delta.Imax=2.25I0,Imin=0.25I0,V=2T1+T=0.80.\boxed{I_{\max}=2.25I_0,\quad I_{\min}=0.25I_0,\quad V=\frac{2\sqrt T}{1+T}=0.80}.

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

δ=π/2:I=1.25I0.\delta=\pi/2:\quad\boxed{I=1.25I_0}.⟨I⟩before=2I0,⟨I⟩after=(1+T)I0=1.25I0.\boxed{\langle I\rangle_{\mathrm{before}}=2I_0,\quad\langle I\rangle_{\mathrm{after}}=(1+T)I_0=1.25I_0}.

Physical check

Using T rather than its square root on the field amplitude would overestimate the loss of interference modulation.