Diffraction — Question 8

Section 35-2 · Physics pages 5746–5747

Question 8 Narrowing an illuminated slit trades peak brightness for angular spread In a one-dimensional scalar far-field model with fixed incident irradiance and fixed slit height, the on-axis amplitude is proportional to a, transmitted power to a, and central angular width to 1/a. Reduce the slit width from a to a/4. q I original peak Schematic; labels, not drawing lengths, specify the data. (a) Calculate the ratios of peak intensity, central angular width, and transmitted power. (b) Use the rescaled intensity Ia(q) = Ca2F(aq), with fixed integrable shape F, to verify the total-power scaling by integration over q.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 8 - Solution Narrowing an illuminated slit trades peak brightness for angular spread q I original peak (a) Method and calculation E′ peak/Epeak = 1/4 =⇒I′ peak/Ipeak = 1/16 . ∆θ′/∆θ = 4, P ′/P = 1/4 . (b) Interpretation and further calculation ∫∞ −∞ Ia(q)dq = Ca2 ∫ F(aq)dq = Ca ∫ F(v)dv. P ∝a, P ′/P = (a/4)/a = 1/4 . Physical check The reduced peak is partly offset by spreading over more angles; multiplying peak scaling by width scaling gives the correct power ratio.

Question 8

Narrowing an illuminated slit trades peak brightness for angular spread

In a one-dimensional scalar far-field model with fixed incident irradiance and fixed slit height, the on-axis amplitude is proportional to a, transmitted power to a, and central angular width to 1/a1/a. Reduce the slit width from a to a/4a/4.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Calculate the ratios of peak intensity, central angular width, and transmitted power.

  2. Use the rescaled intensity Ia(q)=Ca2F(aq)I_a(q)=C a^2F(aq), with fixed integrable shape F, to verify the total-power scaling by integration over q.

Question 8 - Solution

Narrowing an illuminated slit trades peak brightness for angular spread

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

Epeak′/Epeak=1/4⇒Ipeak′/Ipeak=1/16.E_{\mathrm{peak}}^\prime/E_{\mathrm{peak}}=1/4\Longrightarrow\boxed{I_{\mathrm{peak}}^\prime/I_{\mathrm{peak}}=1/16}.Δθ′/Δθ=4,P′/P=1/4.\boxed{\Delta\theta^\prime/\Delta\theta=4,\quad P^\prime/P=1/4}.

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

∫−∞∞Ia(q)dq=Ca2∫F(aq)dq=Ca∫F(v)dv.\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}I_a(q)dq=Ca^2\int F(aq)dq=Ca\int F(v)dv.P∝a,P′/P=(a/4)/a=1/4.\boxed{P\propto a,\quad P^\prime/P=(a/4)/a=1/4}.

Physical check

The reduced peak is partly offset by spreading over more angles; multiplying peak scaling by width scaling gives the correct power ratio.