Spherical Refracting Surfaces — Question 4

Section 34-5 · Physics pages 5638–5639

Question 4 A plane interface changes apparent depth while preserving transverse size Use n1/p + n2/q = (n2 −n1)/R and m = −n1q/(n2p) for paraxial refraction. Here p is positive on the incident side, q on the outgoing side, and R when the center lies on the outgoing side. A small object is p=12 cm below a plane water-air surface. Light travels from water n1=4/3 to air n2=1. Observe close to the normal, so the paraxial model applies. O I air water Schematic; labels, not drawing lengths, specify the data. (a) Take the infinite-radius limit to find the signed image distance and apparent depth. (b) Calculate the transverse magnification and explain the distinct depth and height factors.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 4 - Solution A plane interface changes apparent depth while preserving transverse size O I air water (a) Method and calculation R →∞: n1/p + n2/q = 0 ⇒q = −(n2/n1)p . q = −9 cm, dapparent = 9 cm . (b) Interpretation and further calculation m = −n1 n2p ( −n2p n1 ) = 1 . dapparent/dactual = 3/4, hI/hO = 1 . Physical check The object appears shallower without a first-order change of transverse size; these are different directions of magnification.

Question 4

A plane interface changes apparent depth while preserving transverse size

Use n1/p+n2/q=(n2−n1)/Rn_1/p+n_2/q=(n_2-n_1)/R and m=−n1q/(n2p)m=-n_1q/(n_2p) for paraxial refraction. Here p is positive on the incident side, q on the outgoing side, and R when the center lies on the outgoing side. A small object is p=12 cm below a plane water-air surface. Light travels from water n1=4/3 to air n2=1. Observe close to the normal, so the paraxial model applies.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Take the infinite-radius limit to find the signed image distance and apparent depth.

  2. Calculate the transverse magnification and explain the distinct depth and height factors.

Question 4 - Solution

A plane interface changes apparent depth while preserving transverse size

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

R→∞:n1/p+n2/q=0⇒q=−(n2/n1)p.R\to\infty:\quad n_1/p+n_2/q=0\Rightarrow\boxed{q=-(n_2/n_1)p}.q=−9cm,dapparent=9cm.\boxed{q=-9\,\mathrm{cm},\quad d_{\mathrm{apparent}}=9\,\mathrm{cm}}.

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

m=−n1n2p(−n2pn1)=1.m=-\frac{n_1}{n_2p}\left(-\frac{n_2p}{n_1}\right)=\boxed{1}.dapparent/dactual=3/4,hI/hO=1.\boxed{d_{\mathrm{apparent}}/d_{\mathrm{actual}}=3/4,\quad h_I/h_O=1}.

Physical check

The object appears shallower without a first-order change of transverse size; these are different directions of magnification.