Total Internal Reflection — Question 9

Section 33-8 · Physics pages 5528–5529

Question 9 Evanescent penetration grows near the critical angle For n1 greater than n2, define θc = sin−1(n2/n1) and let θ = θc + δ with small positive delta in radians. The evanescent decay constant is κ = k0 √ n2 1 sin2 θ −n2 2, where k0 is fixed. δ ℓE Schematic; labels, not drawing lengths, specify the data. (a) Expand the expression inside the square root to first order in delta. (b) Derive the leading penetration-depth dependence and predict the change when delta is reduced by a factor of four.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 9 - Solution Evanescent penetration grows near the critical angle δ ℓE (a) Method and calculation sin2(θc + δ) = sin2 θc + 2 sin θc cos θc δ + O(δ2). n2 1 sin2 θ −n2 2 ≃2n2 √ n2 1 −n2 2 δ. (b) Interpretation and further calculation ℓE = κ−1 ≃ 1 k0 √ 2n2 √ n2 1 −n2 2 δ . ℓE ∝δ−1/2, ℓE(δ/4) ≃2ℓE(δ) . Physical check This ideal plane-wave result diverges as the threshold is approached from above; finite beam size limits the usefulness of that limiting model.

Question 9

Evanescent penetration grows near the critical angle

For n1 greater than n2, define θc=sin⁡−1(n2/n1)\theta_c=\sin^{-1}(n_2/n_1) and let θ=θc+δ\theta=\theta_c+\delta with small positive delta in radians. The evanescent decay constant is κ=k0n12sin⁡2θ−n22\kappa=k_0\sqrt{n_1^2\sin^2\theta-n_2^2}, where k0 is fixed.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Expand the expression inside the square root to first order in delta.

  2. Derive the leading penetration-depth dependence and predict the change when delta is reduced by a factor of four.

Question 9 - Solution

Evanescent penetration grows near the critical angle

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

sin⁡2(θc+δ)=sin⁡2θc+2sin⁡θccos⁡θcδ+O(δ2).\sin^2(\theta_c+\delta)=\sin^2\theta_c+2\sin\theta_c\cos\theta_c\,\delta+O(\delta^2).n12sin⁡2θ−n22≃2n2n12−n22δ.n_1^2\sin^2\theta-n_2^2\simeq2n_2\sqrt{n_1^2-n_2^2}\,\delta.

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

ℓE=κ−1≃1k02n2n12−n22δ.\boxed{\ell_E=\kappa^{-1}\simeq\frac{1}{k_0\sqrt{2n_2\sqrt{n_1^2-n_2^2}\,\delta}}}.ℓE∝δ−1/2,ℓE(δ/4)≃2ℓE(δ).\boxed{\ell_E\propto\delta^{-1/2},\quad\ell_E(\delta/4)\simeq2\ell_E(\delta)}.

Physical check

This ideal plane-wave result diverges as the threshold is approached from above; finite beam size limits the usefulness of that limiting model.