The Traveling Electromagnetic Wave, Quantitatively — Question 6

Section 33-3 · Physics pages 5422–5423

Question 6 A proposed quarter-cycle magnetic lag fails Faraday law A proposed vacuum field pair is Ey = E0 cos ϕ and Bz = (E0/c) sin ϕ, where ϕ = kx −ωt and omega=ck. There are no other field components. ϕ normalized fields proposed cosine and sine Schematic; labels, not drawing lengths, specify the data. (a) Calculate both sides of the one-dimensional Faraday equation and show the mismatch. (b) Can adding an ordinary electric current density repair that mismatch without changing E or B? Give the correct traveling Bz with no static offset.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 6 - Solution A proposed quarter-cycle magnetic lag fails Faraday law ϕ normalized fields proposed cosine and sine (a) Method and calculation ∂xEy = −kE0 sin ϕ, −∂tBz = (ωE0/c) cos ϕ = kE0 cos ϕ. −kE0 sin ϕ̸ = kE0 cos ϕ in general . (b) Interpretation and further calculation ∂xEy = −∂tBz contains no ordinary J ⇒current cannot repair it . Bz = (E0/c) cos ϕ satisfies Faraday law. Physical check A field amplitude ratio alone is insufficient; relative phase and propagation signs must also satisfy the field equations.

Question 6

A proposed quarter-cycle magnetic lag fails Faraday law

A proposed vacuum field pair is Ey=E0cos⁡ϕE_y=E_0\cos\phi and Bz=(E0/c)sin⁡ϕB_z=(E_0/c)\sin\phi, where ϕ=kx−ωt\phi=kx-\omega t and omega=ck. There are no other field components.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Calculate both sides of the one-dimensional Faraday equation and show the mismatch.

  2. Can adding an ordinary electric current density repair that mismatch without changing E or B? Give the correct traveling Bz with no static offset.

Question 6 - Solution

A proposed quarter-cycle magnetic lag fails Faraday law

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

∂xEy=−kE0sin⁡ϕ,−∂tBz=(ωE0/c)cos⁡ϕ=kE0cos⁡ϕ.\partial_xE_y=-kE_0\sin\phi,\quad-\partial_tB_z=(\omega E_0/c)\cos\phi=kE_0\cos\phi.−kE0sin⁡ϕ≠kE0cos⁡ϕ in general.\boxed{-kE_0\sin\phi\ne kE_0\cos\phi\text{ in general}}.

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

∂xEy=−∂tBz contains no ordinary 𝑱⇒current cannot repair it.\partial_xE_y=-\partial_tB_z\text{ contains no ordinary }\mathbf J\Rightarrow\boxed{\text{current cannot repair it}}.Bz=(E0/c)cos⁡ϕsatisfies Faraday law.\boxed{B_z=(E_0/c)\cos\phi}\quad\text{satisfies Faraday law}.

Physical check

A field amplitude ratio alone is insufficient; relative phase and propagation signs must also satisfy the field equations.