Maxwell's Rainbow — Question 5

Section 33-1 · Physics pages 5380–5381

Question 5 Measured arrival differences can reflect emission timing instead of vacuum dispersion A distant source emits an optical pulse and a radio pulse along the same vacuum path. The radio detector has an additional calibrated electronic delay of 8 microseconds. The recorded radio arrival is 23 microseconds after the optical arrival. Both waves propagate at c. signal L Schematic; labels, not drawing lengths, specify the data. (a) Infer the radio emission delay relative to the optical emission. (b) If the common source distance doubles while emission timing and detector delays stay fixed, find the new recorded delay and explain the cancellation.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 5 - Solution Measured arrival differences can reflect emission timing instead of vacuum dispersion signal L (a) Method and calculation tr,rec = tr,emit + L/c + 8 µs, to,rec = to,emit + L/c. tr,emit −to,emit = 23 −8 = 15 µs . (b) Interpretation and further calculation ∆trec(2L) = ∆temit + 2L/c −2L/c + 8 µs. ∆trec(2L) = 23 µs . Physical check Arrival-time comparisons require emission and instrument timing; a nonzero measured delay alone does not establish different vacuum speeds.

Question 5

Measured arrival differences can reflect emission timing instead of vacuum dispersion

A distant source emits an optical pulse and a radio pulse along the same vacuum path. The radio detector has an additional calibrated electronic delay of 8 microseconds. The recorded radio arrival is 23 microseconds after the optical arrival. Both waves propagate at c.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Infer the radio emission delay relative to the optical emission.

  2. If the common source distance doubles while emission timing and detector delays stay fixed, find the new recorded delay and explain the cancellation.

Question 5 - Solution

Measured arrival differences can reflect emission timing instead of vacuum dispersion

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

tr,rec=tr,emit+L/c+8μs,to,rec=to,emit+L/c.t_{r,\mathrm{rec}}=t_{r,\mathrm{emit}}+L/c+8\,\mu\mathrm s,\quad t_{o,\mathrm{rec}}=t_{o,\mathrm{emit}}+L/c.tr,emit−to,emit=23−8=15μs.\boxed{t_{r,\mathrm{emit}}-t_{o,\mathrm{emit}}=23-8=15\,\mu\mathrm s}.

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

Δtrec(2L)=Δtemit+2L/c−2L/c+8μs.\Delta t_{\mathrm{rec}}(2L)=\Delta t_{\mathrm{emit}}+2L/c-2L/c+8\,\mu\mathrm s.Δtrec(2L)=23μs.\boxed{\Delta t_{\mathrm{rec}}(2L)=23\,\mu\mathrm s}.

Physical check

Arrival-time comparisons require emission and instrument timing; a nonzero measured delay alone does not establish different vacuum speeds.