Vectors and Scalars — Question 6

Section 3-1 · Physics pages 322–323

Question 6 Printed arrow length must be interpreted through its scale Two calibrated diagrams use parallel north references. In diagram I, an eastward displacement arrow measures 3.0 cm on the original paper and the scale is 2.0 m per centimetre. In diagram II, an eastward displacement arrow measures 6.0 cm and the scale is 1.0 m per centimetre. The measurements and scales are exact. A third diagram shows an eastward velocity arrow 3.0 cm long at a scale of 2.0 m/s per centimetre. The sketches below are schematic; use the stated paper measurements rather than measuring this page. I 3.0 paper cm; 2.0 m/cm II 6.0 paper cm; 1.0 m/cm Schematic length comparison for the two displacement diagrams; east is to the right. (a) Recover all three represented magnitudes and identify which physical vectors can be equal. (b) Diagram I is photocopied at 150% linear size, including its labels. Find the new printed arrow length and the correct new scale in metres per centimetre. What error results if the old written scale is used unchanged? (c) Why would a drawn scale bar copied together with the arrow remain useful, while a literal “2.0 m per cm” label becomes wrong after resizing? (d) Convert the first displacement magnitude to physical centimetres. Explain why changing physical units does not change the vector, while confusing paper centimetres with physical centimetres does.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 6 - Solution Printed arrow length must be interpreted through its scale I 3.0 paper cm; 2.0 m/cm II 6.0 paper cm; 1.0 m/cm (a) Multiply paper length by the relevant calibration. DI = (2)(3) = 6 m = DII = (1)(6),⃗ DI =⃗DII , v = (2)(3) = 6 m/s The first two arrows are equal physical displacements despite their different paper lengths. The third is a velocity, so it cannot equal either displacement even with the same numerical magnitude. (b) Resizing the symbol requires inverse resizing of its scale. ℓ′ = 1.5(3) = 4.5 cm, k′ = 6 4.5 = 4 3 m/cm, 9 −6 6 = 50% The enlarged arrow still represents 6 m. Keeping the old calibration would report 9 m, an excess of 3 m or 50 percent. (c) Relative drawn lengths survive a common enlargement. ℓ′ arrow ℓ′ bar = 1.5ℓarrow 1.5ℓbar = ℓarrow ℓbar A copied scale bar and copied arrow enlarge together, preserving their length ratio. A numerical label per actual ruler centimetre must instead be updated. (d) Separate unit conversion from drawing calibration. 6 m (100 cm 1 m ) = 600 cm̸ = 3 cm on paper Physical unit conversion preserves the displacement. Paper centimetres describe the symbol and must be multiplied by its calibration before comparing with physical lengths.

Question 6

Printed arrow length must be interpreted through its scale

Two calibrated diagrams use parallel north references. In diagram I, an eastward displacement arrow measures 3.0 cm on the original paper and the scale is 2.0 m per centimetre. In diagram II, an eastward displacement arrow measures 6.0 cm and the scale is 1.0 m per centimetre. The measurements and scales are exact.

A third diagram shows an eastward velocity arrow 3.0 cm long at a scale of 2.0 m/s per centimetre. The sketches below are schematic; use the stated paper measurements rather than measuring this page.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Recover all three represented magnitudes and identify which physical vectors can be equal.

  2. Diagram I is photocopied at 150% linear size, including its labels. Find the new printed arrow length and the correct new scale in metres per centimetre. What error results if the old written scale is used unchanged?

  3. Why would a drawn scale bar copied together with the arrow remain useful, while a literal “2.0 m per cm” label becomes wrong after resizing?

  4. Convert the first displacement magnitude to physical centimetres. Explain why changing physical units does not change the vector, while confusing paper centimetres with physical centimetres does.

Question 6 - Solution

Printed arrow length must be interpreted through its scale

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Multiply paper length by the relevant calibration.

DI=(2)(3)=6m=DII=(1)(6),D→I=D→II,v=(2)(3)=6m/sD_I=(2)(3)=6\,\mathrm m=D_{II}=(1)(6),\quad\boxed{\vec D_I=\vec D_{II}},\quad v=(2)(3)=6\,\mathrm{m/s} The first two arrows are equal physical displacements despite their different paper lengths. The third is a velocity, so it cannot equal either displacement even with the same numerical magnitude.

(b) Resizing the symbol requires inverse resizing of its scale.

ℓ′=1.5(3)=4.5cm,k′=64.5=43m/cm,9−66=50%\ell'=1.5(3)=4.5\,\mathrm{cm},\quad k'=\frac6{4.5}=\frac43\,\mathrm{m/cm},\quad\frac{9-6}{6}=50\% The enlarged arrow still represents 6 m. Keeping the old calibration would report 9 m, an excess of 3 m or 50 percent.

(c) Relative drawn lengths survive a common enlargement.

ℓarrow′ℓbar′=1.5ℓarrow1.5ℓbar=ℓarrowℓbar\frac{\ell'_{\mathrm{arrow}}}{\ell'_{\mathrm{bar}}}=\frac{1.5\ell_{\mathrm{arrow}}}{1.5\ell_{\mathrm{bar}}}=\frac{\ell_{\mathrm{arrow}}}{\ell_{\mathrm{bar}}} A copied scale bar and copied arrow enlarge together, preserving their length ratio. A numerical label per actual ruler centimetre must instead be updated.

(d) Separate unit conversion from drawing calibration.

6m(100cm1m)=600cm≠3cm on paper6\,\mathrm m\left(\frac{100\,\mathrm{cm}}{1\,\mathrm m}\right)=600\,\mathrm{cm}\ne3\,\mathrm{cm}\text{ on paper} Physical unit conversion preserves the displacement. Paper centimetres describe the symbol and must be multiplied by its calibration before comparing with physical lengths.