Calculating the Magnetic Field Due to a Current — Question 10

Section 29-1 · Physics pages 4670–4671

Question 10 An asymmetric finite wire can be inferred from two endpoint angles A straight segment lies on the x axis from x=-a to x=+3a and carries I toward +x. The field point is P = (0, a, 0). Only this segment contribution is required. Use vacuum permeability µ0 ≃4π × 10−7 T m/A where numerical values are needed. I P a −a 3a Schematic; labels, not drawing lengths, specify the data. (a) Find the field at P without treating P as a midpoint. (b) What fraction of the total is contributed by the portion x=0 to x=3a? Explain why tripling that portion length does not triple its field.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 10 - Solution An asymmetric finite wire can be inferred from two endpoint angles I P a −a 3a (a) Method and calculation Bz = µ0I 4πa [ x √ x2 + a2 ]3a −a .⃗ B = µ0I 4πa ( 1 √ 2 + 3 √ 10 ) ˆz . (b) Interpretation and further calculation f+ = 3/ √ 10 1/ √ 2 + 3/ √ 10 = 3 3 + √ 5 = .572949. dBz/dx = µ0Ia 4π(x2 + a2)3/2 →0 (|x| →∞). More distant elements contribute less because of both their distance and cross-product angle. Physical check The two endpoint contributions have the same sign because the perpendicular from P falls within the segment; their angles are unequal.

Question 10

An asymmetric finite wire can be inferred from two endpoint angles

A straight segment lies on the x axis from x=-a to x=+3a and carries I toward +x. The field point is P=(0,a,0)P=(0,a,0). Only this segment contribution is required. Use vacuum permeability μ0≃4π×10−7Tm/A\mu_0\simeq4\pi\times10^{-7}\,\mathrm{T\,m/A} where numerical values are needed.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Find the field at P without treating P as a midpoint.

  2. What fraction of the total is contributed by the portion x=0 to x=3a? Explain why tripling that portion length does not triple its field.

Question 10 - Solution

An asymmetric finite wire can be inferred from two endpoint angles

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

Bz=μ0I4πa[xx2+a2]−a3a.B_z=\frac{\mu_0 I}{4\pi a}\left[\frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+a^2}}\right]_{-a}^{3a}.B→=μ0I4πa(12+310)ẑ.\boxed{\vec B=\frac{\mu_0 I}{4\pi a}\left(\frac1{\sqrt2}+\frac3{\sqrt{10}}\right)\hat z}.

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

f+=3/101/2+3/10=33+5=.572949.f_+=\frac{3/\sqrt{10}}{1/\sqrt2+3/\sqrt{10}}=\boxed{\frac3{3+\sqrt5}}=.572949.dBz/dx=μ0Ia4π(x2+a2)3/2→0(|x|→∞).dB_z/dx=\frac{\mu_0Ia}{4\pi(x^2+a^2)^{3/2}}\to0\quad(|x|\to\infty).More distant elements contribute less because of both their distance and cross-product angle.

Physical check

The two endpoint contributions have the same sign because the perpendicular from P falls within the segment; their angles are unequal.