Superconductors — Question 7

Section 26-8 · Physics pages 4304–4305

Question 7 The density of superconducting carriers controls the screening length Use the supplied London relation λ = √ ms/(µ0nsq2s). A model has ns(T) = ns(0)[1 −(T/Tc)4], with carrier mass and charge fixed. T/Tc λ Axes and labels specify the model; the sketch is schematic. (a) Find the penetration-depth ratio as a function of temperature. (b) Find the temperature where penetration depth doubles and the remaining fraction of superconducting carrier density.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 7 - Solution The density of superconducting carriers controls the screening length T/Tc λ (a) Method and calculation λ(T) λ(0) = √ ns(0) ns(T). λ(T)/λ(0) = [1 −(T/Tc)4]−1/2. (b) Interpretation and further calculation 2 = [1 −(T/Tc)4]−1/2 ⇒T/Tc = (3/4)1/4 = .930605. ns(T)/ns(0) = 1/4. Physical check The divergence near Tc signals weakening screening within the model; microscopic details are not derived from this phenomenological law.

Question 7

The density of superconducting carriers controls the screening length

Use the supplied London relation λ=ms/(μ0nsqs2)\lambda=\sqrt{m_s/(\mu_0n_sq_s^2)}. A model has ns(T)=ns(0)[1−(T/Tc)4]n_s(T)=n_s(0)[1-(T/T_c)^4], with carrier mass and charge fixed.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Find the penetration-depth ratio as a function of temperature.

  2. Find the temperature where penetration depth doubles and the remaining fraction of superconducting carrier density.

Question 7 - Solution

The density of superconducting carriers controls the screening length

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

λ(T)λ(0)=ns(0)ns(T).\frac{\lambda(T)}{\lambda(0)}=\sqrt{\frac{n_s(0)}{n_s(T)}}.λ(T)/λ(0)=[1−(T/Tc)4]−1/2.\lambda(T)/\lambda(0)=[1-(T/T_c)^4]^{-1/2}.

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

2=[1−(T/Tc)4]−1/2⇒T/Tc=(3/4)1/4=.930605.2=[1-(T/T_c)^4]^{-1/2}\Rightarrow T/T_c=(3/4)^{1/4}=.930605.ns(T)/ns(0)=1/4.n_s(T)/n_s(0)=1/4.

Physical check

The divergence near Tc signals weakening screening within the model; microscopic details are not derived from this phenomenological law.