The Electric Field Due to a Charged Disk — Question 10

Section 22-6 · Physics pages 3590–3591

Question 10 At fixed total charge a smaller disk gives a larger axial field A uniform disk has fixed total positive charge Q but variable radius R. Observe at a fixed height z > 0. Its density is constrained by σ = Q/(πR2) ≤σmax. z R P Schematic; labels, not drawing lengths, specify the data. (a) Rationalize E = 2kQ[1 −z/ √ z2 + R2]/R2 to show directly how it varies with R. (b) Find the radius maximizing E under the density constraint and compare the unconstrained R →0 limit with a point charge.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 10 - Solution At fixed total charge a smaller disk gives a larger axial field z R P (a) Method and calculation s = √ z2 + R2, 1 −z/s = R2 s(s + z). E = 2kQ s(s + z), ds/dR = R/s > 0. Both positive denominator factors increase with R, so E decreases strictly for R > 0. (b) Interpretation and further calculation R ≥ √ Q πσmax ⇒Ropt = √ Q πσmax . R →0 : E →2kQ z(2z) = kQ/z2. The unconstrained limiting field is finite, but that limit would require unbounded density at fixed Q. Physical check Keeping Q fixed and keeping density fixed are different design constraints and lead to different radius dependence.

Question 10

At fixed total charge a smaller disk gives a larger axial field

A uniform disk has fixed total positive charge Q but variable radius R. Observe at a fixed height z>0z>0. Its density is constrained by σ=Q/(πR2)≤σmax\sigma=Q/(\pi R^2)\le\sigma_{\max}.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Rationalize E=2kQ[1−z/z2+R2]/R2E=2kQ[1-z/\sqrt{z^2+R^2}]/R^2 to show directly how it varies with R.

  2. Find the radius maximizing E under the density constraint and compare the unconstrained R→0R\to0 limit with a point charge.

Question 10 - Solution

At fixed total charge a smaller disk gives a larger axial field

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

s=z2+R2,1−z/s=R2s(s+z).s=\sqrt{z^2+R^2},\quad1-z/s=\frac{R^2}{s(s+z)}.E=2kQs(s+z),ds/dR=R/s>0.E=\frac{2kQ}{s(s+z)},\quad ds/dR=R/s>0.Both positive denominator factors increase with R, so E decreases strictly for R>0R>0.

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

R≥Qπσmax⇒Ropt=Qπσmax.R\ge\sqrt{\frac{Q}{\pi\sigma_{\max}}}\Rightarrow R_{\mathrm{opt}}=\sqrt{\frac{Q}{\pi\sigma_{\max}}}.R→0:E→2kQz(2z)=kQ/z2.R\to0:\quad E\to\frac{2kQ}{z(2z)}=kQ/z^2.The unconstrained limiting field is finite, but that limit would require unbounded density at fixed Q.

Physical check

Keeping Q fixed and keeping density fixed are different design constraints and lead to different radius dependence.