The Electric Field Due to a Point Charge — Question 3

Section 22-3 · Physics pages 3516–3517

Question 3 Uncertain source size and distance produce a worst-case field range Use k = 8.99 × 109 N m2/C2; treat the specified charges as points in vacuum. A positive point charge has Q ∈[1.90, 2.10] nC and its distance from P lies in [.0980, .1020] m. All combinations are allowed hard bounds. Q P r Schematic; labels, not drawing lengths, specify the data. (a) Find the allowed field-magnitude interval. (b) Compare with the nominal value at 2.00 nC and .100 m, and derive the first-order relative sensitivity to small changes in Q and r.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 3 - Solution Uncertain source size and distance produce a worst-case field range Q P r (a) Method and calculation Emin = k1.90 × 10−9 .10202 ≈1641.77 N/C. Emax = k2.10 × 10−9 .09802 ≈1965.74 N/C. (b) Interpretation and further calculation Enom = 1798 N/C, dE E = dQ Q −2dr r . |δE|/E ≲.050 + 2(.020) = .090 to first order. The exact interval need not be symmetric around the nominal field; linear sensitivity is only an approximation. Physical check Minimum charge with maximum distance gives the minimum field, not minimum charge with minimum distance.

Question 3

Uncertain source size and distance produce a worst-case field range

Use k=8.99×109Nm2/C2k=8.99\times10^9\,\mathrm{N\,m^2/C^2}; treat the specified charges as points in vacuum. A positive point charge has Q∈[1.90,2.10]Q\in[1.90,2.10] nC and its distance from P lies in [.0980,.1020][.0980,.1020] m. All combinations are allowed hard bounds.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Find the allowed field-magnitude interval.

  2. Compare with the nominal value at 2.00 nC and .100 m, and derive the first-order relative sensitivity to small changes in Q and r.

Question 3 - Solution

Uncertain source size and distance produce a worst-case field range

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

Emin=k1.90×10−9.10202≈1641.77N/C.E_{\min}=k\frac{1.90\times10^{-9}}{.1020^2}\approx1641.77\,\mathrm{N/C}.Emax=k2.10×10−9.09802≈1965.74N/C.E_{\max}=k\frac{2.10\times10^{-9}}{.0980^2}\approx1965.74\,\mathrm{N/C}.

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

Enom=1798N/C,dEE=dQQ−2drr.E_{\mathrm{nom}}=1798\,\mathrm{N/C},\quad\frac{dE}{E}=\frac{dQ}{Q}-2\frac{dr}{r}.|δE|/E≲.050+2(.020)=.090to first order.|\delta E|/E\lesssim.050+2(.020)=.090\quad\text{to first order}.The exact interval need not be symmetric around the nominal field; linear sensitivity is only an approximation.

Physical check

Minimum charge with maximum distance gives the minimum field, not minimum charge with minimum distance.